Herron v. Horry County South Carolina et al
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED 34 . The complaint is therefore DISMISSED as against Defendant J. Reuben Long Detention Center without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 10/26/2011. (dsto, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Horry County, South Carolina, et al.,
Civil Action No. 4:11-1377-TLW-TER
On June 6, 2011, the Plaintiff, Joseph Herron (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this
civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. #2).
The matter now comes before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation
(“the Report”) filed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers, III, to whom this case had
previously been assigned. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff’s
complaint be dismissed as against Defendant J. Reuben Long Detention Center without prejudice
and without issuance and service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii).
(Doc. #34). Objections were due on October 11, 2011. Plaintiff has filed no objections to the
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept,
reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. §
636. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby
v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).
The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. #34). The complaint is therefore
DISMISSED as against Defendant J. Reuben Long Detention Center without prejudice and
without issuance and service of process.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 26, 2011
Florence, South Carolina
__s/Terry L. Wooten______
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?