Pulliam et al v. Clark et al
Filing
153
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO THE NATIONAL AUCTION GROUP, INC. Signed by The Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 4/16/2013.(hcic, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
C/A No.: 4:11-CV-03047-RBH
Norman Pullium and Patriot’s
Plantation II, LLC,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
David R. Clark, The National Auction
)
Group, Inc., Patriot’s Plantation, LLC, )
First Century Bank, N.A., First Sentry
)
Bank, Inc., and Bank of Floyd,
)
)
Defendants. )
)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO THE NATIONAL
AUCTION GROUP, INC.
This matter comes before this Court on Motion of The Defendant The National Auction
Group, Inc. pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), FRCP, for an Order dismissing The National Auction
Group, Inc. from this action with prejudice [ECF Document # 152]. All parties have consented
to this motion. Now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
All claims or causes of action that have been or could have been asserted by the
Plaintiffs against The National Auction Group, Inc., particularly those contained in the Second
Amended Complaint, are dismissed with prejudice.
2.
The National Auction Group, Inc.’s Cross-Claims against Patriot’s Plantation,
LLC and First Century Bank, N.A. are dismissed with prejudice.
3.
All claims or causes of action that have been or could have been asserted against
The National Auction Group, Inc. by the other parties to this action are dismissed with prejudice.
4.
All claims or causes of action that have been or could have been asserted by The
National Auction Group, Inc. against the other parties to this action are dismissed with prejudice.
5.
The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
6.
All claims and causes of action not involving The National Auction Group, Inc.
shall remain pending.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Florence, South Carolina
April 16, 2013
s/R. Bryan Harwell
R. Bryan Harwell
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?