Hamilton v. Dolgencorp Inc et al
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. # 26 ). This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure of service of process. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 11/16/2012. (prou, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Dolgencorp Inc., et al.,
Civil Action No. 4:11-3419-TLW-KDW
Plaintiff Barbara Hamilton (“Plaintiff”) brought this civil action pursuant to Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1991. (Doc. # 1).
The matter now comes before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation
(“the Report”) filed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D. West to whom this case had previously
been assigned. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the case be dismissed
without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. # 26).
Objections were due by November 8, 2012. Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Report.
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept,
reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. §
636. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby
v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).
The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. # 26). This case is dismissed
without prejudice for failure of service of process.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 16, 2012
Florence, South Carolina
__s/Terry L. Wooten______
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?