Riley v. Drew

Filing 30

ORDER. The parties have ten (10) days to make any additional submissions in accordance with Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 04/12/2013. (dsto, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION COREY O. RILEY, Petitioner, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) vs. DARLENE DREW, Respondent. __________________________________________ C/A No.: 4:12-1894-RMG-TER ORDER The pro se Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus on July 6, 2012, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241. Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) on October 30, 2012. As both parties have submitted evidence outside of the pleadings, the motion to dismiss is being converted to a motion for summary judgment. The parties have ten (10) days to make any additional submissions in accordance with Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. April 12, 2013 Florence, South Carolina s/Thomas E. Rogers Thomas E. Rogers, III United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?