Bolton v. Byars et al
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/21/2013.(dsto, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
THURSTON M. BOLTON,
WILLIAM R. BYARS, DIRECTOR,
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF )
J. BRYANT DIEHL, CHIEF CANTEEN
BRANCH, SOUTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR
Civil Action No.: 4:13-cv-0607-RMG-TER
Presently before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery. (Doc. #37). In this
Motion, Plaintiff requests an order compelling Defendants to submit additional responses and/or
respond more fully to certain Interrogatories and Request to Produce. Defendants filed a response in
opposition and Plaintiff filed a reply. (Docs. #45 and #48).
Plaintiff has not complied with Local Civil Rules 37.01(B), D.S.C. when he did not attach the
relevant discovery requests and responses to his motion as supporting documentation. Therefore, the
motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge
October 21, 2013
Florence, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?