Luberda v. Purdue Frederick Corp et al
Filing
242
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. Signed by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell on 2/26/2015. (hcic, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Daniel L. Luberda as Guardian ad Litem
for Daniel C. Luberda,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Purdue Frederick Corp., Purdue Pharma
L.P., The Purdue Pharma Company, Purdue
Pharmaceutical Products L.P., Purdue
Pharma Technologies Inc., Purdue Products
L.P., Purdue Pharmaceuticals Limited
Partnership, Michael Friedman, Paul
Goldenheim, M.D., John N. Stewart, and
Russell Gasdia,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-00897-RBH
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER
Whereas, the parties to this Consent Confidentiality Order (“parties”), have stipulated
that certain discovery material is and should be treated as confidential, and have agreed to the
terms of this order; accordingly, it is this 26th day of February, 2015, ORDERED:
1.
Scope. All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to
discovery requests and all deposition testimony and deposition exhibits and any other materials
which may be subject to discovery (hereinafter collectively “documents”) shall be subject to this
Order concerning confidential information as set forth below.
2.
Form and Timing of Designation. Documents, information or other tangible
items shall be designated as Confidential Information by marking words that in substance state:
“CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER [or
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ACCESS RESTRICTED BY COURT
1
ORDER] IN LUBERDA V. PURDUE, USDCt, District of South
Carolina, CA No. 4:13-cv-00897-RBH”
The above markings shall in no way obscure the content of the document on which it is placed.
Inadvertent failure to designate any information as confidential and subject to this Protective
Order shall not constitute a waiver of any otherwise valid claim for protection, so long as such
claim is asserted within 30 days of the discovery of the inadvertent failure. At such time,
arrangements shall be made for return of all copies of the inadvertently misdesignated documents
to the Designating Party and for the submission, where appropriate, of properly labeled copies.
3.
Documents Which May be Designated Confidential. Any party to this action
or other person who produces, supplies or provides access to information, documents or other
tangible items for use in this action in the Course of discovery (hereinafter the “Designating
Party” or the “Producing Party”) may designate as “Confidential Information” any such material
that it reasonably and in good faith believes is not in the public domain and otherwise
constitutes: (i) a Trade Secret; (ii) material or information not appropriate for public disclosure
because of personal privacy interests or contractual rights of third parties; (iii) confidential
research, development or commercial information, including but not limited to sensitive financial
data, technical information, proprietary or nonpublic commercial information, or commercially
and/or competitively sensitive information; or (iv) information otherwise protectable under
applicable rules, statutes, or common law.
When a Producing Party Produces copies of
documents that have been designated “Confidential,” it shall contemporaneously serve and file a
certification, using the form attached hereto as Attachment A, identifying the documents by
Bates Number or otherwise and signed by counsel for the Producing Party certifying that all
documents so marked satisfy the relevant definitions contained in this Order.1
1
The attorney who reviews the documents and certifies them to be CONFIDENTIAL must be admitted to
the Bar of at least one state but need not be admitted to practice in the District of South Carolina and need
2
4.
Depositions. If, during a deposition or within 30 days thereafter, a Designating
Party advises the court reporter that Confidential information has been disclosed during a
deposition, the entire transcript shall be treated as Confidential for 30 days after receipt of the
deposition transcript, within which time counsel for the Designating Party shall advise the court
reporter of the pages and lines on which Confidential information appears. At the conclusion of
such 30-day period, transcript pages and exhibits containing Confidential Information shall
continue to be treated as Confidential under this Order, and shall be designated:
“CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER [or
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ACCESS RESTRICTED BY COURT
ORDER] IN LUBERDA V. PURDUE, USDCt, District of South
Carolina, CA No. 4:13-cv-00897-RBH”
The court reporter shall include on the cover page a clear indication that portions of the
deposition have been designated confidential.
5.
Protection of Confidential Material.
a.
General Protections. Documents designated CONFIDENTIAL and/or HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL under this Order shall not be used or disclosed by the parties or
counsel for the parties or any other persons identified below (¶ 5(b).) for any purposes
whatsoever other than preparing for and conducting the litigation in which the documents
were disclosed (including any appeal of that litigation).
b.
Limited Third Party Disclosures. The parties and counsel for the parties shall
not disclose or permit the disclosure of any documents designated CONFIDENTIAL
and/or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Order to any other person or
entity except as set forth in subparagraphs (1)-(6) below, and then only after the person to
whom disclosure is to be made has executed an acknowledgment (in the form set forth at
not apply for pro hac vice admission. By signing the certification, counsel submits to the jurisdiction of
this court in regard to the certification.
3
Attachment B hereto), that he or she has read and understands the terms of this Order and
is bound by it. Counsel for the party obtaining the person’s signature on the
Confidentiality Agreement will retain the original signed agreement. Subject to these
requirements, the following categories of persons may be allowed to review documents
which have been designated CONFIDENTIAL and/or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
pursuant to this Order:
(1)
The Court and its personnel;
(2)
Counsel and employees of counsel for the parties who have responsibility
for the preparation and trial of the lawsuit;
(3)
Parties and employees of a party to this Order but only to the extent
counsel shall certify that the specifically named individual party or employee’s
assistance is necessary to the conduct of the litigation in which the information is
disclosed2;
(4)
Court reporters engaged for depositions and those persons, if any,
specifically engaged for the limited purpose of making photocopies of documents;
and
(5)
Any consultant, investigator or expert (collectively, “Expert”) who is
assisting in the preparation and/or trial of this litigation, but only to the extent
reasonably necessary to enable such expert to render such assistance; provided
the, prior to disclosure, each such Expert shall execute the Confidentiality
Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit B (“Confidentiality Agreement B”) and the
2
At or prior to the time such party or employee completes his or her acknowledgment of review of this
Order and agreement to be bound by it (Attachment B hereto), counsel shall complete a certification in
the form shown at Attachment C hereto. Counsel shall retain the certification together with the form
signed by the party or employee.
4
conditions described in paragraph 12 are met. Further, no party may provide
access to confidential materials to any person who is an employee, consultant,
officer, or director of any competitor of any Defendant without prior consent of
the Defendant whose materials are being provided or approved by the court.2
c.
Control of Documents.
Counsel for the parties shall take reasonable efforts to
prevent unauthorized disclosure of documents designated as Confidential pursuant to the
terms of this order.
Counsel shall maintain a record of those persons, including
employees of counsel, who have reviewed or been given access to the documents along
with the originals of the forms signed by those persons acknowledging their obligations
under this Order.
d.
Copies. All copies, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions (hereinafter
referred to collectively as “copies”), of documents designated as Confidential under this
Order or any portion of such a document, shall be immediately affixed with the
designation “CONFIDENTIAL” if the word does not already appear on the copy. All
such copies shall be afforded the full protection of this Order.
e.
If a party wishes to disclose any information designated as Confidential to any
person not described in paragraph 5 of this Protective Order, permission to so disclose
must be requested from the Designating Party in writing. If the Designating Party objects
to the proposed disclosure, no such disclosure shall be made unless the court in this
action or an action designated as a specified case, upon application by the party
requesting such permission, orders otherwise. However, each party may disclose its own
For purposes of this order, the term “Competitor” means any entity that is engaged in the design,
formulation or manufacture of controlled-release pharmaceuticals, abuse-resistant pharmaceuticals, or
prescription analgesic pharmaceuticals or that designs or manufactures ingredients or machinery used in
the manufacture of controlled-release pharmaceuticals, abuse-resistant pharmaceuticals, or prescription
analgesic pharmaceuticals.
2
5
Confidential Information without regard to this Protective Order, unless otherwise
prohibited from doing so under an existing order or duty.
f.
Any notes, summaries, compilations or copies containing Confidential
Information or electronic images or databases containing Confidential Information shall
be subject to the terms of this Protective Order to the same extent as the material or
information from which such notes, summaries, compilations, copies, electronic images
or databases are made or derived.
6.
Filing of Confidential Materials. In the event a party seeks to file any material
that is subject to protection under this Order with the court, that party shall take appropriate
action to insure that the documents receive proper protection from public disclosure including:
(1) filing a redacted document with the consent of the party who designated the document as
confidential; (2) where appropriate (e.g. in relation to discovery and evidentiary motions),
submitting the documents solely for in camera review; or (3) where the preceding measures are
not adequate, seeking permission to file the document under seal pursuant to the procedural steps
set forth in Local Civil Rule 5.03, DSC, or such other rule or procedure as may apply in the
relevant jurisdiction. Absent extraordinary circumstances making prior consultation impractical
or inappropriate, the party seeking to submit the document to the court shall first consult with
counsel for the party who designated the document as confidential to determine if some measure
less restrictive than filing the document under seal may serve to provide adequate protection.
This duty exists irrespective of the duty to consult on the underlying motion. Nothing in this
Order shall be construed as a prior directive to the Clerk of Court to allow any document be filed
under seal. The parties understand that documents may be filed under seal only with the
permission of the court after proper motion pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.03.
6
7.
Greater Protection of Specific Documents. No party may withhold information
from discovery on the ground that it requires protection greater than that afforded by this Order
unless the party moves for an Order providing such special protection.
8.
Challenges to Designation as Confidential. Any party may, at any time after
production of material designated under this Protective Order, object to its designation by
notifying the Designating Party in writing of that objection and specifying the designated
material to which the objection is made. The parties shall, within 15 days of service of the
written objections, confer concerning the objection.
If the objection is not resolved, the
Designating Party shall, within 15 days of the conference, file and serve a noticed motion to
resolve the dispute over the designation of the material and shall bear the burden of proof on the
issue. If no such motion is filed within the stated time period, the confidential designation shall
be removed and the material shall cease to be subject to protection under this order. If a motion
is filed, information subject to dispute shall, until further order of the court, be treated consistent
with its designation as Confidential Information. With respect to any material which is redesignated or ceases to be subject to the protection of this Protective Order, the Designating
Party shall, at its expense, provide to each party which so requests additional copies thereof from
which all confidentiality legends affixed hereunder have been adjusted to reflect the redesignation or removed as appropriate.
9.
Treatment on Conclusion of Litigation.
a.
Order Remains in Effect. All provisions of this Order restricting the use of
documents designated CONFIDENTIAL and/or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL shall
continue to be binding after the conclusion of the litigation unless otherwise agreed or
ordered.
7
b.
Return of CONFIDENTIAL Documents. Within thirty (30) days after the
conclusion of the litigation, including conclusion of any appeal, all documents treated as
confidential under this Order, including copies as defined above (¶5.d.) shall be returned
to the producing party unless: (1) the document has been entered as evidence or filed
(unless introduced or filed under seal); (2) the parties stipulate to destruction in lieu of
return; or (3) as to documents containing the notations, summations, or other mental
impressions of the receiving party, that party elects destruction. Notwithstanding the
above requirements to return or destroy documents, counsel may retain attorney work
product including an index which refers or relates to information designated
CONFIDENTIAL and/or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL so long as that work product does
not duplicate verbatim substantial portions of the text of confidential documents.
This
work product continues to be Confidential under the terms of this Order. An attorney
may use his or her work product in a subsequent litigation provided that its use does not
disclose the confidential documents.
10.
Order Subject to Modification. This Order shall be subject to modification on
motion of any party or any other person who may show an adequate interest in the matter to
intervene for purposes of addressing the scope and terms of this Order. The Order shall not,
however, be modified until the parties shall have been given notice and an opportunity to be
heard on the proposed modification.
11.
No Judicial Determination. This Order is entered based on the representations
and agreements of the parties and for the purpose of facilitating discovery. Nothing herein shall
be construed or presented as a judicial determination that any specific document or item of
information designated as CONFIDENTIAL by counsel is subject to protection under Rule 26(c)
8
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or otherwise until such time as a document-specific
ruling shall have been made.
12.
Prior to disclosing Confidential documents, material or information to an Expert
under paragraph 5(b)(5), counsel for the party contemplating disclosure shall determine that
(i) disclosure to an Expert of particular Confidential Information is, in that counsel’s good faith
judgment, necessary to that party’s prosecution or defense of the case, (ii) the Expert has agreed
that he or she will not use any information learned from the documents for any other personal or
commercial purpose than to assist counsel in preparing and prosecuting claims related to
OxyContin® and (iii) based on direct inquiry to the Expert, counsel has no actual knowledge that
the Expert has previously violated any confidentiality agreement and counsel has informed the
Expert that violation of this agreement, including subsection (ii), can lead to charges of civil and
criminal contempt, or invite civil suit against him or her; and (iv) at the conclusion of the case,
counsel will provide to Defendants a list of all Experts who have reviewed Confidential
Information covered by this agreement, whether or not they testify.
13.
Any party wishing to present or address Confidential Information to the court at a
hearing or proceeding prior to trial shall give the Designating Party notice prior to the hearing or
proceeding so that the Designating Party may have an opportunity to request that the matter be
heard in the presence of only those persons authorized by this Protective Order to have access to
Confidential Information.
14.
In the case of inadvertently produced privileged and/or work product documents,
upon request of the Producing Party, the documents together with all copies thereof and any
notes made therefrom shall be returned to the party claiming privilege and/or work product
immunity within seven (7) days and any notes made therefrom shall be destroyed, provided,
however, should any party wish to challenge the privilege and/or work product immunity, said
9
party must file an appropriate motion with the Court within six (6) days of receiving the request
for return from the Producing Party. The burden shall be on the Producing Party to show the
documents are subject to the immunity and the objecting party shall treat the subject documents
as privileged until the Court has ruled on the matter.
15.
If another court or administrative agency subpoenas or orders production of
Confidential Information that a party has obtained under the terms of this Protective Order, such
party shall, if there are fewer than 10 days to comply, within two, or if more than 10 days, within
at least seven business days prior to the due date of compliance, notify the Designating Party of
the pendency of the subpoena or order in writing, and shall not produce the Confidential
Information until the Designating Party has had an opportunity, within the time allowed for
response to the subpoena or order, to take appropriate steps to protect the material. It shall be the
responsibility of the Designating Party to obtain relief from the subpoena or order prior to the
due date of compliance. To give the Designating Party an opportunity to obtain such relief, the
party from whom the information is sought shall not make the disclosure before the actual due
date of compliance set forth in the subpoena or order.
16.
Persons Bound. This Order shall take effect when entered and shall be binding
upon: (1) counsel who signed below and their respective law firms; and (2) their respective
clients.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ R. Bryan Harwell
R. Bryan Harwell
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
February 26, 2015
Florence, South Carolina
10
ATTACHMENT A
CERTIFICATION BY COUNSEL OF DESIGNATION
OF INFORMATION AS CONFIDENTIAL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Daniel L. Luberda as Guardian ad Litem
for Daniel C. Luberda,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Purdue Frederick Corp., Purdue Pharma
L.P., The Purdue Pharma Company, Purdue
Pharmaceutical Products L.P., Purdue
Pharma Technologies Inc., Purdue Products
L.P., Purdue Pharmaceuticals Limited
Partnership, Michael Friedman, Paul
Goldenheim, M.D., John N. Stewart, and
Russell Gasdia,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-00897-RBH
Certification by Counsel of Designation
of Information as Confidential
Documents produced herewith which are listed on the production index provided to
counsel have been marked as CONFIDENTIAL subject to the Confidentiality Order entered in
this action which Order is dated February 26, 2015.
By signing below, I am certifying that the marked documents and document sets have
been reviewed by counsel who properly applied this Order's definition of "confidential" to them,
and that, based on that review and relying on their work and judgment, the marked documents
and document sets are properly subject to protection under the terms of the Confidentiality
Order.
Check and complete one of the two options below.
❑
I am a member of the Bar of the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina. My District Court Bar number is ______.
11
❑
I am not a member of the Bar of the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina but am admitted to the bar of one or more states. The state in
which I conduct the majority of my practice is [state in which I practice most]
where my Bar number is [that state's Bar #]. I understand that by completing this
certification I am submitting to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court
for the District of South Carolina as to any matter relating to this certification.
Date: _________________
_________________________
Signature of Counsel
_________________________
Printed Name of Counsel
12
ATTACHMENT B
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
AND
AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Daniel L. Luberda as Guardian ad Litem
for Daniel C. Luberda,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Purdue Frederick Corp., Purdue Pharma
L.P., The Purdue Pharma Company, Purdue
Pharmaceutical Products L.P., Purdue
Pharma Technologies Inc., Purdue Products
L.P., Purdue Pharmaceuticals Limited
Partnership, Michael Friedman, Paul
Goldenheim, M.D., John N. Stewart, and
Russell Gasdia,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-00897-RBH
Acknowledgment of Understanding
and
Agreement to be Bound
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he or she has read the Confidentiality Order
dated February 26, 2015, in the above captioned action, understands the terms thereof, and
agrees to be bound by such terms. The undersigned submits to the jurisdiction of the United
States District Court for the District of South Carolina in matters relating to the Confidentiality
Order and understands that the terms of said Order obligate him/her to use discovery materials
designated CONFIDENTIAL and/or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL solely for the purposes of the
above-captioned action, and not to disclose any such confidential information to any other
person, firm or concern.
The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the Stipulated Confidentiality Order may
result in penalties for contempt of court.
Name:
______________________________
Job Title:
______________________________
13
Employer:
________________________________
Business Address:
________________________________
Date: _________________
________________________
Signature
14
ATTACHMENT C
CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL OF NEED
FOR ASSISTANCE OF PARTY/EMPLOYEE
Daniel L. Luberda as Guardian ad Litem
for Daniel C. Luberda,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Purdue Frederick Corp., Purdue Pharma
L.P., The Purdue Pharma Company, Purdue
Pharmaceutical Products L.P., Purdue
Pharma Technologies Inc., Purdue Products
L.P., Purdue Pharmaceuticals Limited
Partnership, Michael Friedman, Paul
Goldenheim, M.D., John N. Stewart, and
Russell Gasdia,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-00897-RBH
Certification of Counsel of Need for
Assistance of Party/Employee
Pursuant to the Confidentiality Order entered in this action, most particularly the
provisions of Paragraph 6.b.2., I certify that the assistance of ___________________ is
reasonably necessary to the conduct of this litigation and that this assistance requires the
disclosure to this individual of information which has been designated as CONFIDENTIAL.
I have explained the terms of the Confidentiality Order to the individual named above
and will obtain his or her signature on an “Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement to
be Bound” prior to releasing any confidential documents to the named individual and I will
release only such confidential documents as are reasonably necessary to the conduct of the
litigation.
The individual named above is:
❑
A named party;
❑
An employee of named party ____________. This employee’s job title is
___________ and work address is _________________.
Date: _______________
_________________________
Signature
15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?