Davis v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al

Filing 20

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice and without issuance and service of process for failure to prosecute this action. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 1/14/2014. (mcot, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA James H. Davis, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) South Carolina Department of Corrections; ) Warden Cohen; Sgt. Smalls; Lt. Ayala; ) Captain Powell; Carl Eikeberger; James ) Matthews; Raymoone Mallory, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Civil Action No. 4:13-02306-RBH ORDER Plaintiff James H. Davis, while a state prisoner and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action alleging constitutional claims against the Defendants. Plaintiff, however, did not provide adequate financial information with his in forma pauperis motion (ECF No. 2), and he incorrectly completed documents necessary for service. By Order dated November 7, 2013, Plaintiff was instructed to correct these deficiencies prior to December 5, 2013. ECF No. 11. The mail sent by the Court to Plaintiff, which enclosed the Order and necessary forms to bring the case into proper form, was returned to the Court on November 7, 2013, marked “return to sender.” ECF No. 15. In Plaintiff’s three other pending cases at that time, mail was also returned to the Court as undeliverable. See C/A No. 4:13-1500-RBH-TER (ECF No. 27); C/A No. 4:13-1508 (ECF No. 28);C/A No. 2:131646 (ECF No. 18). The record reflects that Plaintiff has not contacted this Court with notice of a change of address and has failed to keep his address current for purposes of receiving information about this case. Plaintiff had failed to pursue and prosecute this case, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this case should not remain open. See Link v. Wabash Railroad Company, 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has discretion to control docket of case). ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process for failure to prosecute this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/R. Bryan Harwell R. Bryan Harwell United States District Judge January 14, 2014 Florence, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?