Perez v. Immigration and Custom Enforcement

Filing 16

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 05/08/2014. (dsto, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Wbnernel Perez, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) Immigration and Custom Enforcement, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________________) 4:14-cv-39-JFA-TER ORDER This case is before the Court because of Petitioner’s failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s Order of March 26, 2014. ECF No. 9 A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge ordered Petitioner to submit items needed to render this case into proper form within twenty-one days, and specifically informed Petitioner that if he failed to do so, this case would be subject to dismissal. The Court has not received any response from Petitioner and the time for his compliance has passed. The mail in which the Order was sent to Petitioner at the address provided when the case was filed has not been returned to the court, thus it is presumed that Petitioner received the Order, but has neglected to comply with it within the time permitted under the Order. Petitioner’s lack of response to the Order indicates an intent to not prosecute this case, and subjects this case to dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)(district courts may dismiss an 1 action if a Petitioner fails to comply with an order of the court.); see also Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989)(dismissal with prejudice appropriate where warning given); Chandler Leasing Corp. v. Lopez, 669 F.2d 919, 920 (4th Cir. 1982)(court may dismiss sua sponte). Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. May 8, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?