McDaniel v. Berkeley County Jail et al

Filing 18

ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 04/30/2014. (dsto, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Jordan McDaniel, Plaintiff, vs. Berkeley County Jail, and Medical Provider, Southern Health, Defendants. ________________________________________ ) C/A No. 4:14-301-RMG-TER ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) This is a civil action filed by a local prisoner. Under Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, pretrial proceedings in this action have been referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE: By filing this case, Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the United States of America in the amount of $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914. This debt is not dischargeable in the event Plaintiff seeks relief under the bankruptcy provisions of the United States Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(17). A prisoner is permitted to file a civil action without prepayment of fees or security therefor under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. A review of the Motion reveals that Plaintiff does not have the funds to prepay the filing fee. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. TO THE CLERK OF COURT: This case is subject to summary dismissal based on an initial screening conducted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915 and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Therefore, the Clerk of Court shall not issue any summonses nor shall the Clerk of Court forward this matter to the United States Marshal for service of process at this time. IT IS SO ORDERED. April 30, 2014 Florence, South Carolina s/ Thomas E. Rogers, III Thomas E. Rogers, III United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?