Cleveland v. Evans Correctional Institution et al
Filing
64
ORDER. Plaintiff is hereby directed to provide to the Clerk of Court, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, updated service forms with correct information/addresses for Defendant Officer M. Thomas should he desire to attempt service upon the named Defendant again. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 02/19/2015. (dsto, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
George Cleveland, III,
) C/A No. 4:14-2444-RBH-TER
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
ORDER
vs.
)
)
Warden Willie Eagleton, individually and in his official)
capacity; Associate Warden Roland McFadden,)
individually and in his official capacity; Officer M.)
Thomas; Unknown Nurse Manager and Unknown)
Medical Doctor;
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________________
)
This matter is before the court because on October 31, 2014, the United States Marshal filed
a service of process form (USM-285) with the Clerk of Court to inform this court that service of
process upon Defendant Officer M. Thomas could not be accomplished. See USM-285 Return
Unexecuted, ECF No. 27. The Marshal indicated on the form that there was “no Officer Thomas.”
Id.
TO THE CLERK OF COURT:
In addition to a copy of this Order and a copy of the USM-285 Return Unexecuted, ECF No.
27, the Clerk of Court is directed to send to Plaintiff one summons and one Form USM-285.
TO PLAINTIFF:
Plaintiff is hereby directed to provide to the Clerk of Court, within twenty-one (21) days of
the date of this order, updated service forms with correct information/addresses for Defendant
Officer M. Thomas should he desire to attempt service upon the named Defendant again. Blank
summons forms and USM-285 forms are attached to this Order for Plaintiff’s use.
The providing of sufficient, accurate, and complete information on the Forms USM-285
is the responsibility of Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s attention is directed to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure that provides,
[i]f a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the
court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action
without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a
specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must
extend the time for service for an appropriate period.
1
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
Plaintiff is hereby warned that if he does not respond to this Order and/or does not
provide a new summons form and Form USM-285 for Defendant Officer M. Thomas with a
new updated address for the unserved defendant, Defendant Officer M. Thomas may be
subject to dismissal without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge
February 19, 2015
Florence, South Carolina
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?