Vinson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 20

ORDER finding as moot 17 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 19 Motion to Remand. The Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is hereby REVERSED with a REMAND of the cause to the Commissioner. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 3/31/2015.(gnan )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION LUANNE MANN VINSON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant. ) Civil Action No. 4:14-03754-TER ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) The Defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security, has moved this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the cause to the Commissioner for purposes of conducting a de novo hearing. Further administrative action is warranted in this case. On order of the Court, the agency’s Appeals Council will remand the case to an ALJ with instructions to further evaluate the medical opinions of record. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner’s request for remand of this action for further proceedings, this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a REMAND of the cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.1 See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). AND IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas E. Rogers, III Thomas E. Rogers, III United States Magistrate Judge March 31, 2015 Florence, South Carolina. 1The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 58.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?