Vinson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Filing
20
ORDER finding as moot 17 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 19 Motion to Remand. The Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is hereby REVERSED with a REMAND of the cause to the Commissioner. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 3/31/2015.(gnan )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
LUANNE MANN VINSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner
Of Social Security,
Defendant.
) Civil Action No. 4:14-03754-TER
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
The Defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security, has moved this
Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand
of the cause to the Commissioner for purposes of conducting a de novo hearing.
Further administrative action is warranted in this case. On order of the Court, the
agency’s Appeals Council will remand the case to an ALJ with instructions to further evaluate
the medical opinions of record.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or
reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence
four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner’s request for remand of this action
for further proceedings, this Court hereby
REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
with a REMAND of the cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.1 See
Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge
March 31, 2015
Florence, South Carolina.
1The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, Rule 58.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?