Bennekin v. Polson et al
Filing
13
ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail this Order, along with a copy of the initial Order and all attachments, ECF No. 8 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 12/9/2014. (mcot, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Terance Terill Bennekin,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Kenneth Bryan Polson;
Niyoka Monique Stone,
Defendants.
________________________________________
) C/A No. 4:14-4128-BHH-KDW
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
This case is before the court for review of Plaintiff’s compliance with the directions in
the initial Order issued on October 31, 2014. ECF No. 8. Petitioner submitted a new address after
the Order was mailed to his previous address. ECF No. 10. It is unclear whether the Order was
forwarded to Plaintiff by the recipient at the old address (Darlington County Detention Center)
because the mail in which the Order was sent has not been returned undelivered to the court.
TO THE CLERK OF COURT:
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail this Order, along with a copy of the initial Order
and all attachments, ECF No. 8, to Plaintiff at the address that is now on the docket (Hill-Finklea
Detention Center).
TO PLAINTIFF:
This case is not in proper form for service at this time. If you do not bring this case into
proper form within the time permitted by this Order, this case may be dismissed for failure
to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of this court under Rule 41 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. Under General Order In Re: Procedures in Civil Actions Filed by
Prisoner Pro Se Litigants, No. 3:07-mc-5014-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2007), the undersigned is
giving you until January 5, 2015, to comply with the directions contained in the initial Order,
which is being forwarded to you along with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 9, 2014
Florence, South Carolina
Kaymani D. West
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?