Moore v. Stirling et al

Filing 46

ORDER: Respondents shall file an Answer or other response to the Petition 43 as soon as reasonably possible, but no later than fifty (50) days from the entry of this Order. Respondents shall file all dispositive motions no l ater than forty-five (45) days after the Answer is filed. With respect to dispositive motions by Respondents, this Order shall serve as a scheduling order. The undersigned will establish a subsequent briefing schedule after Respondents have answered or filed a dispositive motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/21/2015. (dsto, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Richard Bernard Moore,

)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
Bryan P. Stirling, Commissioner,
)
South Carolina Department of Corrections; )
Joseph McFadden, Warden, Lieber
)
Correctional Institution,
)
)
Respondents. )
)

Civil Case No. 4:14-4691-MGL-TER

ORDER

The above-captioned capital habeas case has been referred to the undersigned United
States Magistrate Judge for preliminary proceedings. Counsel for Petitioner filed the Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus on August 14, 2015. (ECF No. 43.) Counsel for Respondents were
served via the Electronic Case Filing System.
Respondents shall file an Answer or other response to the Petition as soon as reasonably
possible, but no later than fifty (50) days from the entry of this Order. As a courtesy to the
Court, please identify any pages missing from relevant portions of the state court record
submitted in response to the Petition and advise (1) whether an attempt has been made to locate
the missing pages, and (2) the result of the attempt to locate. See Rule 5, Rules Governing
Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.
Respondents shall file all dispositive motions no later than forty-five (45) days after the
Answer is filed. With respect to dispositive motions by Respondents, this Order shall serve as a
scheduling order.

1

The undersigned will establish a subsequent briefing schedule after Respondents have
answered or filed a dispositive motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge

August 21, 2015
Florence, South Carolina

2