Moore v. Stirling et al
Scheduling Order: Petitioner shall file a response to Respondents' motion for summary judgment by August 11, 2017. Respondents shall file a reply to any response no later than 21 days after the response is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/23/2017. (dsto, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Richard Bernard Moore,
Bryan P. Stirling, Commissioner, South
Carolina Department of Corrections;
Joseph McFadden, Warden of Lieber
) C/A No.: 4:14-cv-4691-MGL-TER
On August 14, 2015, the petitioner in this matter, Richard Bernard Moore (“Petitioner”),
filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 43). On November 16, 2015, Respondents
filed a Return and Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 56, 57). Subsequently, on January
13, 2016, the court stayed this matter, pending resolution of Petitioner’s post-conviction relief
application in state court. (ECF No. 67). The court has lifted that stay in a contemporaneously filed
Pursuant to the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, the
following schedule is established for this case:
Petitioner shall file a response to Respondents’ motion for summary judgment by
August 11, 2017.
Respondents shall file a reply to any response no later than 21 days after the response
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge
June 23, 2017
Florence, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?