Moore v. Stirling et al

Filing 93

Scheduling Order: Petitioner shall file a response to Respondents' motion for summary judgment by August 11, 2017. Respondents shall file a reply to any response no later than 21 days after the response is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/23/2017. (dsto, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
_______________________
Richard Bernard Moore,

Petitioner,
vs.

Bryan P. Stirling, Commissioner, South
Carolina Department of Corrections;
Joseph McFadden, Warden of Lieber
Correctional Institution,
Respondents.
___________________________________

) C/A No.: 4:14-cv-4691-MGL-TER
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

On August 14, 2015, the petitioner in this matter, Richard Bernard Moore (“Petitioner”),
filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 43). On November 16, 2015, Respondents
filed a Return and Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 56, 57). Subsequently, on January
13, 2016, the court stayed this matter, pending resolution of Petitioner’s post-conviction relief
application in state court. (ECF No. 67). The court has lifted that stay in a contemporaneously filed
order.
Pursuant to the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, the
following schedule is established for this case:
1.

Petitioner shall file a response to Respondents’ motion for summary judgment by
August 11, 2017.

2.

Respondents shall file a reply to any response no later than 21 days after the response
is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge
June 23, 2017
Florence, South Carolina