Hickson v. Stewart et al

Filing 22

ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts and incorporates the Report and Recommendation 16 by reference in this Order.This action is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process as to Defendants Lake City Police Department and ABC Insurance Company. This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/13/2015. (dsto, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Christopher Hickson, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Officer John Stewart, Individually and in ) his official capacity as a Lake City Police ) Officer; Officer Sandy Thompson, ) Individually and in his official capacity as a ) Lake City Police Officer; Officer Kevin ) Cook, Individually and in his official ) capacity as a Lake City Police Officer; ) Chief of Police Billy Brown and/or Jody ) Cooper, Individually and in their official ) capacity as the Former and/or Present Chief ) of Police of the Lake City Police ) Department; The Lake City Police ) Department; The City of Lake City, and ) ABC Insurance Company, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) C/A NO. 4:15-2433-CMC-TER OPINION and ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s pro se complaint, filed in this court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 (B)(2)(d), DSC, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers, III, for pre-trial proceedings and a Report and Recommendation (“Report”). On September 16, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that Defendants Lake City Police Department and ABC Insurance Company be dismissed from this matter without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of the procedures and requirements for filing objections to the Report and the serious consequences if he failed to do so. Plaintiff has filed no objections and the time for doing so has expired. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with the court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of any portion of the Report of the Magistrate Judge to which a specific objection is made. The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation made by the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). After reviewing the record of this matter, the applicable law, and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the court agrees with the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the court adopts and incorporates the Report and Recommendation by reference in this Order. This action is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process as to Defendants Lake City Police Department and ABC Insurance Company. This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Cameron McGowan Currie CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Columbia, South Carolina October 13, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?