Starling v. Stirling et al

Filing 17

ORDER denying 9 Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/29/2015.(dsto, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION VAN STARLING, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BRYAN P. STIRLNIG, DIRECTOR SCDC, ) MICHAEL McCALL, DEPUTY DIRECTOR ) SCDC, MS. MITCHELL, CKI/MSU ) CASEWORKER, LARRY R. CARTLEDGE, ) WARDEN PCI, CURTIS EARLEY, MAJOR PCI, ) ALL BEING SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL ) CAPACITIES, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) C/A No. 4:15-3636-TLW-TER ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion to remand his state court cause of action for “Breach of Duty” back to state court.1 (Docs. #9). Defendants filed an objection to this motion. (Doc. #14). This motion to remand the state cause of action is denied based on supplemental jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas E. Rogers, III Thomas E. Rogers, III United States Magistrate Judge October 29, 2015 Florence, South Carolina 1 This motion to remand was within Plaintiff’s motion to amend his compliant. (Doc. #9). The motion to amend his complaint was granted by separate court order. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?