Starling v. Stirling et al

Filing 17

ORDER denying 9 Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/29/2015.(dsto, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
VAN STARLING,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BRYAN P. STIRLNIG, DIRECTOR SCDC,
)
MICHAEL McCALL, DEPUTY DIRECTOR
)
SCDC, MS. MITCHELL, CKI/MSU
)
CASEWORKER, LARRY R. CARTLEDGE,
)
WARDEN PCI, CURTIS EARLEY, MAJOR PCI, )
ALL BEING SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL
)
CAPACITIES,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

C/A No. 4:15-3636-TLW-TER

ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion to remand his state court cause of action
for “Breach of Duty” back to state court.1 (Docs. #9). Defendants filed an objection to this motion.
(Doc. #14). This motion to remand the state cause of action is denied based on supplemental
jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge
October 29, 2015
Florence, South Carolina

1

This motion to remand was within Plaintiff’s motion to amend his compliant. (Doc. #9).
The motion to amend his complaint was granted by separate court order.
1