Pressley v. Hopehealth Inc et al
Filing
15
ORDER granting 10 Motion to Substitute Party. United States of America added, Hopehealth Inc and Steve L Reeves (MD) terminated. Signed by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell on 4/11/2016. (hcic, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Monique S. Pressley, as Personal
Representative of the Estate of
Francia Scott Burroughs,
Plaintiff,
v.
HopeHealth, Inc. and
Steve L. Reeves, M.D.
Defendants.
) Civil Action Number: 4:16-cv-00086-RBH
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
On March 21, 2016, the United States filed a motion to substitute the United States for
defendants HopeHealth, Inc., and Steve L. Reeves, M.D., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(2)
and 42 U.S.C. § 233. As an attachment to the motion, the United States filed Plaintiff’s SF-95
administrative Federal Tort Claim, the denial by the Department of Health and Human Services,
and a certification of scope of employment certifying that defendants HopeHealth, Inc., and
Steve L. Reeves, M.D., are deemed to be employees of the United States and were acting within
the scope of their employment at the time of the incident alleged in the Complaint.
Because Plaintiff filed her administrative claim with the Department of Health and
Human Services pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act and the United States Attorney has
certified that HopeHealth, Inc., and Steve L. Reeves, M.D., were employees of the United States
and were acting within the scope of their employment at the time of the incident giving rise to
the Complaint, the United States is the proper party defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2679(d)(2) and 42 U.S.C. § 233. Accordingly, the United States of America is hereby substituted
as the party defendant in the place of HopeHealth, Inc., and Steve L. Reeves, M.D.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 11, 2016
Florence, South Carolina
s/ R. Bryan Harwell
R. Bryan Harwell
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?