Baker v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 33

ORDER granting 29 Motion for Attorney Fees per Rule 406b in the amount of $36,908.75. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 12/19/2018.(gnan )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA John Bolton Baker, ) ) C/A No. 4:16-1262-MBS Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ORDER Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner ) of Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ________________ ___________________ ) Plaintiff John Bolton Baker filed the within action on April 22, 2016, seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff’s application for disability and insurance benefits. By order filed January 5, 2017, and upon motion of the Commissioner, the case was reversed pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration. On April 5, 2017, the court entered an order granting Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $4,197.94 and $416.00 in expenses. This matter now is before the court on motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), which motion was filed on November 21, 2018. Counsel moves for an order awarding an attorney’s fee of $36,908.75. On December 4, 2018, the Commissioner filed a response indicating that she does not object to Plaintiff’s request. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) is granted in the amount of $36,908.75. Plaintiff’s counsel indicates that the $4,197.94 fee awarded under the EAJA will be refunded to Plaintiff in accordance with Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 89, 796 (2002), and counsel hereby is directed to do so. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Margaret B. Seymour Senior United States District Judge Columbia, South Carolina December 19, 2018 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?