Venditti v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 21

ORDER RULING ON 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the order of this Court, REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REMANDS the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 7/5/2017. (gnan )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Susan Mary Venditti, Plaintiff, vs. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 4:16-1630-RMG ORDER This matter comes before the Court for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs application for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB"). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial handling. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R) on June 20, 2017, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded to the agency because of the failure to weigh the medical opinions of various treating and consulting physicians in accord with the Treating Physician Rule, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(c). (Dkt. No. 17 at 24-33). The Commissioner has advised the Court that she does not intend to file objections to the R & R. (Dkt. No. 19). The Court has reviewed the R & R and the record evidence and finds that the Magistrate Judge has ably addressed the factual and legal issues in this matter. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the order of this Court, REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REMANDS the -1- matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this order. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Richard Mark Gergel United States District Judge Charleston, South Carolina July .S., 2017 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?