Zioba v. Myrtle Beach, City of et al

Filing 21

ORDER ALLOWING THE PRODUCTION OF RECORDS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers, III on 2/16/2017. (hcic, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Steven Zioba, Plaintiff, vs. City of Myrtle Beach and John Doe Policeman, both individually and in their capacity as Myrtle Beach Police Officers, Defendants. ) C/A NO.: 4:16-CV-02379-BHH-TER ) ) ) ) ORDER ALLOWING THE ) PRODUCTION OF RECORDS ) ) ) ) ) ) This matter is before the Court upon Motion (Document # 10) of the parties requesting that the Court enter an Order allowing the production of certain records related to the disorderly conduct charge against Plaintiff on July 26, 2015, currently held by the City of Myrtle Beach Police Department. It appears that pursuant to § 17-1-40 of the South Carolina Code of Laws, as amended, an Order was entered expunging the records related to the disorderly conduct charge against the Plaintiff, and the City of Myrtle Beach Police Department is currently holding certain records under seal. The parties agree that the records are relevant to and needed for the litigation of this matter, and, pursuant to § 17-1-40(c)(1), they request an Order of this Court allowing the disclosure of these records. The parties agree that any social security numbers and dates of birth be redacted and the identity of the “victim,” who was a minor at the time, not be disclosed. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Defendant shall produce to Plaintiffs all records, including video recordings, related to those matters for which the Plaintiff was questioned, detained and arrested on July 26, 2015; provided that any social security number and dates of birth be redacted and the identity of the victim not be disclosed. s/Thomas E. Rogers, III The Honorable Thomas E. Rogers, III United States Magistrate Judge February 16, 2017 Florence, South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?