Lane v. South Carolina, The State of et al

Filing 13

ORDER dismissing the case without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable R. Bryan Harwell on 9/27/2016. (bgoo)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Christopher Lane,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
The State of South Carolina; Jean Toal;
)
Donald W. Beatty; Alan Wilson; Edward L.
)
Clements; Paul V. Connarrella; James E.
)
Brogdon; Bryan Sterling; Joseph McFadden; )
Anthony Driggers,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )

C/A No. 4:16-2527-RBH-PJG

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By
order dated July 28, 2016, Plaintiff was given an opportunity to provide the necessary information and
paperwork to bring the case into proper form for evaluation and possible service of process. (ECF No.
6.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to provide the necessary information within a specific time period
would subject the case to dismissal. (Id.) Plaintiff did not respond to the Order and the time for
response has lapsed. Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order
of this Court. Therefore, this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 27, 2016
Florence, South Carolina

s/ R. Bryan Harwell
R. Bryan Harwell
United States District Judge
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within the time period set forth
under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.