Kirtman v. Helbig et al
Filing
96
ORDER: The parties are directed to file any affidavits or documents relating to the service and/or receipt of the pending motions in this case within ten days of the date of this order. Plaintiff should include an explanation of how he became aware that these motions were filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 07/27/2017. (dsto, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
DERRICK E. KIRTMAN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
-vs)
)
)
CHAPLIN HELBIG, S.I.A. STIVERS,
)
WARDEN CRUZ, ASSISTANT
)
HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATOR
)
WHITEHURST, and ASSISTANT
)
WARDEN LANDFORD,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
Civil Action No.: 4:16-cv-2839-TMC-TER
ORDER
Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Document # 85) on June 9, 2017. An
Order (Document # 86) was entered pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975),
giving Plaintiff until July 13, 2017, to respond to the motion and warning Plaintiff that a failure to
respond to Defendants’ motion could result in the motion being granted, resulting in dismissal of his
claims.
On July 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a letter (Document # 94) to the clerk of court stating “that
of [sic] July 6th, 2017, I have not received any copies of orders or motions from the Court.
Specifically, I have not received copies of the Government’s motion for summary judgment, motion
for leave to file excess pages, and any related attachments or orders granting them.” Plaintiff asks
the court to forward him “the most recent Government motions in this case, along with all related
documents as soon as possible. Also, that this letter be made party of the record in support of any
needed motions that may have to be filed for extensions of time to respond if needed.”
The parties are directed to file any affidavits or documents relating to the service
and/or receipt of the pending motions in this case within ten days of the date of this order.
Plaintiff should include an explanation of how he became aware that these motions were filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge
July 27, 2017
Florence, South Carolina
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?