Wicks v. Haley et al

Filing 44

ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 03/13/2017. (dsto, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA David Bryant Wicks, ) C/A No. 4:16-cv-3652-RBH-TER ) vs. ) ) ORDER Hon. Nikki R. Haley, ) Sheriff Kenny Boone, ) E.L. Clements, III, ) Connie Reel-Shearin, ) James W. Carter, ) Anita Scott, ) Angie N. West, ) Rick Ervin, ) Sgt. Huggins, ) Sheriff Kevin L. Auten, ) Sgt. Marielle Kruk, ) Jeff Johnson, ) William V. Meetze, ) Sgt. Christopher Niel, ) Hon. McCrory, ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________________ ) Plaintiff, This is a civil action filed by a pro se litigant. Under Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, pretrial proceedings in this action have been referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. By Orders dated November 18, 2016, December 7, 2016, and January 9, 2017, Plaintiff was given a specific time frame in which to bring this case into proper form and comply with the court’s orders. (ECF Nos. 7, 22, 32). Plaintiff has failed to comply with the court’s orders, and this case is subject to dismissal. PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE: Plaintiff has been granted in forma pauperis status by Order dated November 18, 2016. (ECF No. 7). TO THE CLERK OF COURT: This case is subject to dismissal. Therefore, the Clerk of Court shall not issue any summonses nor shall the Clerk of Court forward this matter to the United States Marshal for service of process at this time. The Clerk of Court shall not enter any change of address submitted by Plaintiff which directs that mail be sent to a person other than Plaintiff unless that person is an attorney admitted to practice before this court who has entered a formal appearance. TO PLAINTIFF: Plaintiff must place the civil action number listed above on any document provided to the court pursuant to this Order. Any future filings in this case must be sent to ((Post Office Box 2317, Florence, South Carolina 29503) the address below. All documents requiring Plaintiff’s signature shall be signed with Plaintiff’s full legal name written in Plaintiff’s own handwriting. Pro se litigants shall not use the “s/typed name” format used in the Electronic Case Filing System. In all future filings with this court, Plaintiff is directed to use letter-sized (8½ inches by 11 inches) paper only, to write or type text on one side of a sheet of paper only and not to write or type on both sides of any sheet of paper. Plaintiff is further instructed not to write to the edge of the paper, but to maintain one inch margins on the top, bottom, and sides of each paper submitted. Plaintiff is a pro se litigant. Plaintiff’s attention is directed to the following important notice: You are ordered to always keep the Clerk of Court advised in writing (Post Office Box 2317, Florence, South Carolina 29503) if your address changes for any reason, so as to assure that orders or other matters that specify deadlines for you to meet will be received by you. If as a result of your failure to comply with this Order, you fail to meet a deadline set by this court, your case may be dismissed for violating this Order. Therefore, if you have a change of address before this case is ended, you must comply with this Order by immediately advising the Clerk of Court in writing of such change of address and providing the court with the docket number of all pending cases you have filed with this court. Your failure to do so will not be excused by the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas E. Rogers, III Thomas E. Rogers, III United States Magistrate Judge March 13, 2017 Florence, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?