Brown v. Stirling et al
Filing
26
JUDGMENT It is hereby ordered that the Complaint in the above-captioned case be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process upon the defendants. (egra, )
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Reginald Brown
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
v.
Bryan P. Stirling, David Tartasky, M. Boykin, Nikkie
Haley
Civil Action No.
4:16-cv-3898-PMD
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
),
%, along with
costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: It is hereby ordered that the Complaint in the above-captioned case be summarily dismissed without
prejudice and without issuance and service of process upon the defendants.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
’ tried by Judge
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior United States District Judge, presiding, adopting Magistrate
Judge Thomas E. Roger’s Report and Recommendation.
Date: February 16, 2017
CLERK OF COURT
s/Elena Graham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?