Brown v. Stirling et al

Filing 26

JUDGMENT It is hereby ordered that the Complaint in the above-captioned case be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process upon the defendants. (egra, )

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Reginald Brown ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff v. Bryan P. Stirling, David Tartasky, M. Boykin, Nikkie Haley Civil Action No. 4:16-cv-3898-PMD Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ ), %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: It is hereby ordered that the Complaint in the above-captioned case be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process upon the defendants. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge ’ tried by Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior United States District Judge, presiding, adopting Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Roger’s Report and Recommendation. Date: February 16, 2017 CLERK OF COURT s/Elena Graham Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?