Rosendall et al v. Voigt et al

Filing 10

ORDER: Plaintiffs shall have ten days from the date of this order to file their amended complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to note Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Document # 5 ) as withdrawn in accordance with the agreement of the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/01/2017. (dsto, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION HILLERY ROSENDALL, TOCARA SMITH, SHAMEKA HAYNESWORTH, and MOKEIA HAMMOND, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) -vs) ) ) HERMAN VOIGHT, individually and in ) his official capacity as employee of the ) South Carolina Department of Corrections, ) and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT ) OF CORRECTIONS, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Civil Action No.: 4:17-cv-0821-BHH-TER ORDER Plaintiffs bring this action alleging federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law claims pursuant to the South Carolina Tort Claims Act (SCTCA), S.C.Code Ann. §§ 15–78–10 et seq. All pretrial proceedings in this case have been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2)(d). Defendants removed the action to this court on March 29, 2017, and filed a Motion to Dismiss (Document # 5) on April 5, 2017. In their Response (Document # 8), Plaintiffs indicated they had spoken with Defendants, who agreed to withdraw their motion if Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. Within their response, Plaintiffs seek leave to file an amended complaint with Defendants’ consent. Defendants confirmed their consent in their Reply (Document # 9). For these reasons, Plaintiffs shall have ten days from the date of this order to file their amended complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to note Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Document # 5) as withdrawn in accordance with the agreement of the parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas E. Rogers, III Thomas E. Rogers, III United States Magistrate Judge May 1, 2017 Florence, South Carolina -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?