Geissler v. Sterling et al

Filing 17

ORDER denying 15 Motion to Request Document Production; denying 16 Second Motion to Request Document Production. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 09/01/2017.(dsto, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION RUSSELL GEISSLER, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BRYAN P. STERLING, ) LEFFORD FATE, Defendants. ) ________________________________________ ) C/A No. 4:17-1746-MBS-TER ORDER Presently before the court are two motions filed by the Plaintiff entitled “Motion to Request Document Production” and “Plaintiff’s Second Request For Document Production.” (Docs. #15 and #16). In these motions, Plaintiff requests that Defendants produce certain items for inspection and copying pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Generally, this court does not enter the discovery process, which is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff may seek discovery from the Defendants and/or non-parties in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rules 26 through 37, 45 generally. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions for production of documents (docs. #15 and #16) are denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 1, 2017 Florence, South Carolina s/Thomas E. Rogers, III Thomas E. Rogers, III United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?