Geissler v. Sterling et al
ORDER denying 15 Motion to Request Document Production; denying 16 Second Motion to Request Document Production. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 09/01/2017.(dsto, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
BRYAN P. STERLING,
C/A No. 4:17-1746-MBS-TER
Presently before the court are two motions filed by the Plaintiff entitled
“Motion to Request Document Production” and “Plaintiff’s Second Request For
Document Production.” (Docs. #15 and #16). In these motions, Plaintiff requests that
Defendants produce certain items for inspection and copying pursuant to Rule 34 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Generally, this court does not enter the discovery process, which is governed
by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff may seek discovery from the
Defendants and/or non-parties in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. See Rules 26 through 37, 45 generally. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions
for production of documents (docs. #15 and #16) are denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 1, 2017
Florence, South Carolina
s/Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?