Dodson v. Conway Hospital Inc

Filing 62

ORDER: Defendant's Petition for Costs is GRANTED in the amount of $2,411.70. Signed by Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell on 05/24/2019. (lsut, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Maureen Dodson,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Conway Hospital, Inc., d/b/a
)
Conway Medical Center,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________ )

Civil Action No.: 4:17-cv-01846-RBH

ORDER

This case was dismissed on summary judgment in favor of Defendant Conway Hosptial,
Inc., d/b/a Conway Medical Center on April 1, 2019. [Judgment, ECF No. 59]. This matter is
now before the court on Defendant’s Petition for Costs filed on April 15, 2019. Plaintiff filed a
memorandum in opposition to Defendant's Petition for Costs.
Prevailing parties are entitled to an award of costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 54(d)(1), which states that “[u]nless a federal statute, these rules, or a court order
provides otherwise, costs – other than attorney’s fees – should be allowed to the prevailing party.”
The rule makes clear that, in the ordinary course, a prevailing party is entitled to an award of costs
and there exists a presumption to that effect. See Cherry v. Champion Int’l Corp., 186 F.3d 442, 446
(4th Cir. 1999). “Accordingly, it is incumbent upon the unsuccessful party to show circumstances
sufficient to overcome the presumption favoring an award of costs to the prevailing party.” Wyne v.
Medo Indus., Inc., 329 F. Supp. 2d 584, 586 (D. Md. 2004) (citing 10 CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT ,
ARTHUR R. MILLER & MARY KAY KANE, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE § 2668 at 232 (3d ed.
1998)). “To overcome the presumption, a district court ‘must justify its decision [to deny costs] by
articulating some good reason for doing so.’” Cherry, 186 F.3d at 446 (quoting Teague v. Bakker,

35 F.3d 978, 996 (4th Cir. 1994) (internal quotations and citations omitted)).
“Costs may be denied to the prevailing party only when there would be an element of
injustice in a presumptive cost award.” Id. (citing Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August, 450 U.S. 346, 355
n.14 (1981)). Factors which may justify refusal by the court to award costs include misconduct by
the prevailing party, the losing party’s inability to pay, the excessiveness of the costs claimed, the
limited value of the prevailing party’s victory, or the closeness and difficulty of the issues decided.
See Teague, 35 F.3d at 996.
Defendant seeks an award of costs in the amount of $2,411.70. Specifically, Defendant
seeks to recover the filing fee for removing the case to federal court ($400.00) and the costs
associated with three depositions that were cited in the Report and Recommendation ($2,011.70).
Plaintiff argues that because she brought her case in good faith, it was a very close case, she is of
modest means, and was the victim of a downturn in the Defendant's hand clinic business, it would
be inequitable to tax her with these costs. However, there is insufficient evidence in the record to
suggest that Plaintiff is of modest means. Additionally, contrary to Plaintiff's assertion, this was not
a close case. Plaintiff has failed to show circumstances sufficient to overcome the presumption
favoring an award of costs to the prevailing party.
The expenses that may be taxed are listed in 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and include the following:
(1) Fees of the clerk and marshal;
(2) Fees for printed or electronically recorded transcripts necessarily obtained for use
in the case;
(3) Fees and disbursements for printing and witnesses;
(4) Fees for exemplification and the costs of making copies of any materials where
2

the copies are necessarily obtained for use in the case;
(5) Docket fees under section 1923 of this title;
(6) Compensation for court appointed experts, compensation of interpreters, and
salaries, fees, expenses, and costs of special interpretation services under section
1828 of this title.
Pursuant to Rule 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1920, Defendant is entitled to the following costs:
1).

Fees of the Clerk - $400.00

2).

Fees for printed or electronically recorded transcripts necessarily obtained for use in the case
- $2,011.70

Total taxable costs: $2,411.70.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Petition for Costs is
GRANTED in the amount of $2,411.70.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 24, 2019
Florence, South Carolina

s/ R. Bryan Harwell
R. Bryan Harwell
United States District Judge

3