Rainey v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 28

ORDER granting Motion for Attorney Fees: Plaintif's motion for attorney fees under § 2412 ECF No. 25 is granted in the amount of $3,872.97 ($3,850.91 + $22.06), to be paid in accordance with the procedures set forth in theCommissioner's response, ECF No. 26 . Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 6/11/2019.(gnan )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Jennifer Rainey, ) ) C/A No. 4:17-2407-MBS Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ORDER Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner ) of Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) Plaintiff Jennifer Rainey filed the within action on September 8, 2017, seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. By order filed February 13, 2019, the decision of the Commissioner was remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. This matter now is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees, which motion was filed on May 13, 2019. Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $3,850.91 in fees and $22.06 in expenses. On May 28, 2019, the Commissioner filed a response informing the court that she does not oppose Plaintiff’s motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for fees under § 2412 (ECF No. 25) is granted in the amount of $3,872.97 ($3,850.91 + $22.06), to be paid in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Commissioner’s response (ECF No. 26). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Margaret B. Seymour Senior United States District Judge Columbia, South Carolina June 11, 2019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?