Scott v. Ray et al

Filing 59

ORDER: The Defendants are given twenty days from the date of this order to brief this issue including, but not limited to, the relevance of Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239 (4th Cir. 2017). Thereafter, Plaintiff shall have fifteen days to file a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/11/2018. (dsto, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
BERNARD SCOTT,
Plaintiff,

vs.
PATRICIA RAY, ALLISON DAYS,
ANGELA SUMPTER, AND CPL.
SHANNON,
Defendants.

____________________________________

) C/A No. 4:17-3100-RBH-TER
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)

In his complaint and in his response to Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment, Plaintiff appears to raise an issue of changes in classification as a form of
retaliation after filing a grievance. The Defendants are given twenty days from the
date of this order to brief this issue including, but not limited to, the relevance of
Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239 (4th Cir. 2017).Thereafter, Plaintiff shall have fifteen
days to file a response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas E. Rogers, III
Thomas E. Rogers, III
United States Magistrate Judge
October 11, 2018
Florence, South Carolina