National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc et al v. Myrtle Beach, City of et al

Filing 161

ORDER: The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 129 , with respect to Plaintiffs' claims arising under the dormant Commerce Clause, the First Amendment, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Defendants' motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' claims under the Equal Protection Clause and 42 U.S.C. § 2000d. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Sherri A Lydon on 8/4/2020. (mcot, )

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 1 of 22

FLORENCE

o

00554

,
v.

,
.
_____________________________________

“the City”)1
the Advancement of Colored People, Inc. (“NAACP”), Harry Briggs, Novice Briggs, Simuel

“Plaintiffs”) filed a Response

1

,

Defendants’ counsel represented to the Court during the hearing on this matter that the

No. 4:09

Defendants collectively as “the City.”
,
1428
TER, 2012 WL 2149777, at *1 n.1 (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2012) (noting “the City
and its Departments are not separate entities”),
01428

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 2 of 22

Myrtle Beach Bike Week Spring Rally (“Harley Week”), and the Atlantic Beach Bikefest
(“Bikefest”). The parties agree that

2018,

(“Operations Plan”)

the City’s
two
laintiffs’

, No. 4:03 1732
May 9, 2005

28,
2

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

of the plaintiffs’ claims.

Entry Number 161

Page 3 of 22

2.
.

e City’s

.

.

,

. 129

30.

134
(“I wasn’t convinced that we needed it.”).

2014,

.

,
n
.

. 137

3

66.

, the City’s Public

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

.

Entry Number 161

Page 4 of 22

57, 137 61.
2

Warren Gall, indicating his desire to “mak[e] [Bikefest] go away” by “suck[ing] the fun
completely out of the event.” ECF No. 137 21. John Pedersen’s proposed strategies

roads; (4) implementing a curfew; and (5) “[g]et[ting] our hands on as many drug dogs as
possible” and “[u]s[ing] them in all traffic stops.”
hearing on this matter that the email is “egregious.” With arguable inconsistency, John Pedersen
later told the City’s Public Information Officer in December of 2014 to “weave in the notion”
that the Operations Plan was “a reaction to the violence” and that the City’s “goal is to provide a
safe experience for both our visitors and our residents.” ECF No. 137
2014
.

utive session. ECF Nos. 137

discussed

50.

Memorial Day Bikefest Task Force (“Task Force”), and he invited local jurisdictions to attend

“
task force is designed to promote communication and collaboration to ensure a safe event.”

2

2014.

4

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 5 of 22

For example, before the Task Force’s first meeting

,
“the loop came because that’s what
Beach wanted to do.” ECF No. 129 10 at 7. “[W]hen their original loop was
presented, it created concerns for the county. And that’s really where we became involved in

independently.”

a “compromise” to the City’s

40

3

,

claims asserted in Plaintiffs’ Ame
the Court grants the City’s motion with respect to all claims other than those raised under the

“[t]he court shall grant

of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a).
“material” if proof of its existence or non

3

.

5

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 6 of 22

fact is “genuine” if the evidence offered is such that a reasonable jury might return a verdict for

movant’s position is insufficient to withstand the sum
Anderson,
Ross v.
Commc’ns Satellite Corp

, 490

U.S. 228 (1989). “Only disputes over facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the

irrelevant or unnecessary will not be counted.” Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248.

.

The Record Fails to Establish a Genuine Issue for Trial Regarding Plaintiffs’
Claims Arising

,
entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff’s dormant Commerce Clause claim because any
6

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 7 of 22

incidental effects on interstate commerce cannot be shown to be “clearly excessive” in relation to

The Commerce Clause grants Congress the power to “regulate commerce with foreign
Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”

.

,
(“[A]
‘
. . .

. . .

’”)
“The

–
state competitors.” Dep’t of Revenue of Ky. v. Da
337

,

.

transportation of persons may sufficiently implicate “commerce” for purposes of the d
n.1
,

87

.

two
573, 578

.

y is whether the state law “

commerce.”
338 (noting a “discriminatory” law is one enacted for the “forbidden
purpose”)

is “demonstrably justified by a factor unrelated to economic protectionism, a

‘discriminatory law is virtually

invalid.’”
7

, 553

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 8 of 22

338
(“[W]
”) (quoting

55

. When determining if a state action is “discriminatory” and thus subject to a rule of
, 553 U.S. at 338, “[c]ourts are afforded some latitude to

the States’ ‘authority under their general police powers to regulate matters of legitimate local
concern.’”

on interstate commerce are only incidental; and the burden on interstate commerce is not “clearly
”

Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint
tegral part of the area’s
Drawing reasonable inferences in Plaintiffs’ favor,

.

21.

–

“

–would
state competitors.”

338.

8

, 553 U.S. at

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 9 of 22

y

y.

,

2016) (“[I]
governmental interests.”).

commerce is “clearly excessive” in relation to the Defendants’ interest in maintaining public

Plaintiffs’ reliance on

h,

40

, 54 F. Supp. 2d at 1284

.
violated the plaintiffs’
“right to travel under the Dormant Commerce Clause of the Constitution.”
87.
did not analyze the plaintiffs’ claims under the

9

two

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 10 of 22

Forman Distillers Corp., 476 U.S. at 578.

, 54

87.

–

–

. Plaintiffs submitted photographs of “No Thru
Traffic” signs

46, 137

the “right to travel” offers little support for Plaintiffs’ dormant Commerce Clause claim. In

314 U.S. at 165 66.
he admitted concept underlying the statute was, generally, “that each community should care
for its own indigent,” and the state’s asserted
“problems of . . . finance, the proportions of which are staggering.”
167.

the risk of “economic isolation . . .
,” whic
,
“an open invitation to retaliatory measures” by other states.
, 314 U.S. at 168. The Court’s conclusion in

10

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 11 of 22

–
–

Social in Nature Rather than Expr
, the City is

Entitled to Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’
United States v. O’Brien.

convey a “particularized message.” Even so, to the extent that activity during Bikefest

United States v. O’Brien,

.

in furtherance of substantial governmental interests; the City’s

tailored to further the City’s interests without unduly burdening expressive conduct.

o
,
609, 618 (1984). “The Constitution guarantees freedom of
indispensable means of preserving other individual liberties.”

.”
11

Protection for “collective effort

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 12 of 22

, 426 F.3d 251, 258 (4th Cir. 2005) (“[A]

which persons are associating is itself protected by the First Amendment.”).

,

,

,

“speech”

,

“sufficiently imbued with the elements of

communication.”

“[N]ot all conduct can be

,” however, “just because the actor intends thereby to express an idea.”
.
whether “[a]n intent to convey a particularized message was present, and [whether] the
elihood was great that the message would be understood by those who viewed it.”
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 404 (1989) (quoting

, 418 U.S. at 410
so “imbued with the

of communication” that they may be considered speech within the meaning of the First

No. 129. It describes Bikefest as an event that includes “motorcycle racin
street festivals.”

Jake Evans, the Mayor of Atlantic Beach, states Bikefest was “just

something put into place to try to bring business to Atlantic Beach.” ECF No. 134
Plaintiff Tyrone Kinard states the event “celebr
12

5.

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 13 of 22

neighboring beaches.” ECF No. 134
Bikefest “provide[s] an opportunity .
ridership.” ECF No. 134 34 at ¶ 9. William McNeill states the event is “a car show, a bike show,
a fashion show, and a beach vacation.” ECF No. 134
son states that, to him, Bikefest is an opportunity to “dispel negative assumptions about
African American motorcycle clubs” and to “advocate[e] for a true community, support, and
fellowship.” ECF No. 134

10.

.

political, or cultural significance. Drawing reasonable factual inferences in Plaintiffs’ favor, the

,

.

. 1231,

, 490 U.S. at 19.

constitute pure speech “entitled to
comprehensive protection under the First Amendment.”
–

13

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 14 of 22

(denying Government’s request to forfeit rights associated with
, noting “[t]

. . .
”),
–
’

and

,

Top Hatters motorcycle club members’ expressive associational claim,
freedom, equality, and/or death are not particularized messages”

.

“particularized” or

“understood by those who viewed it.”

11.

United States v. O’Brien

O’Brien

14

“

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 15 of 22

State police power is general, and it “extends to all matters affecting the public
health or the public morals.”

sufficiently tailored to the City’s public safety interest in policing the event.

O’Brien
entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claim.
in the City’s Decision to Implement the Operations Plan, the
City’s Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied as to Plaintiffs’ Cause
.

Plaintiffs’ claim
ty’s motion is denied as to these
.

“deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” U.S. Const. amend.

15

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 16 of 22

,

d

,

found there to be a “significant factual dispute,”

riminatory purpose is the “sole” or even “primary” motivation for the challenged action.

–66

,

,

(“
.”);
16

, 429 U.S. at

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 17 of 22

266 (demanding “a sensitive inquiry into such circumstantial and direct
may be available.”).
s this issue involves a determination of individuals’ subjective motivation, summary

“The judgments surrounding discretionary action
almost inevitably are influenced by the decisionmaker’s experiences, values, and emotions.

summary judgment.”

, 457 U.S. at 816 17.

4

, 429 U.S. at 266–
–

–

4

, 364 U.S. 339 (1960), a court “must” look to evidence beyond disparate
, 429 U.S. at 266.

17

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 18 of 22

to the City, while Bikefest drew “law breakers” and “lewd
people.” ECF No. 134

at litigation, Mr. Leath testified to his belief that “black crowds and white crowds . . .
party differently.” ECF No. 134

addition to historic evidence tending to show that race has played a role in the City’s

. ohn
,
“

”

City officials after the 2014 shootings, counseling that the City must either take a “soft approach
or a hard one,” but that in any event, the city “MUST make it very UNCOMFORTABLE for
them to be here” and that “[n]obody cares about the race card.” ECF No. 29

wished to see Myrtle Beach “remain a ‘Family’ destination, rather than a run down
slum that only thugs would support.” ECF No. 137
18

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 19 of 22

ed to City Council, a visitor expressed their sickness and disgust over “what
happened during [Bikefest].” ECF No. 137 65 at 2. “No one wants to attribute this to a particular
race issue because of the political implications but face it, it is what it is.”

127.

state actors’

at 822. “[S]uch a task is made nearly impossible in this case given
[the state actor]’s hasty dismissal” of the

d

,
n.2

d, “the loop came because

that’s what the City of Myrtle Beach wanted to do.” ECF No. 129 10 at 7. “[W]hen [the City’s]
original loop was presented, it created concerns for the county. And that’s really where we

19

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 20 of 22

together instead of independently.”
the traffic loop was in place before the Task Force was even created, and the Task Force “had no
authority to do anything . . . . [E]ach jurisdiction maintained its own autonomy.” ECF No. 129 7
City’s motivation is irrelevant or

Anderson,
477 U.S. at 249.

The City’s motion is also denied as to Plaintiffs’ claim under 42 U.S.C. §

3.
.
this Claim.

42 U.S.C. § 1981 provides as follows:

20

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

Entry Number 161

Page 21 of 22

state actors through 42 U.S.C. § 1983. “[T]
by
state governmental units . . . .”
,

’n

Fed’n of African Am. Contractors

by

Fed’n of African Am. Contractors,
5

.S

.

Accordingly, because Plaintiffs’ first cause of action is brought under a statute that does

After a thorough review of the parties’ arguments, the record, and the applicable law, and
for the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF
ct to Plaintiffs’ claims arising under the dormant Commerce Clause, the First
Amendment, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Defendants’ motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs’ claims

5

, 96

–

21

, 441 F.3d 1129, 1137 (10th

4:18-cv-00554-SAL

Date Filed 08/04/20

22

Entry Number 161

Page 22 of 22