Funderburk v. Johnson et al

Filing 84

JUDGMENT by the Clerk. This case is dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). (dsto, )

Download PDF
4:20-cv-02903-JMC Date Filed 08/01/22 Entry Number 84 Page 1 of 1 AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Paris Laquisha Funderburk Plaintiff v. Deputy Johnson, Deputy N. Vinson, Deputy William Ballew, Deputy Josh Gillespie, Major Freeman, Captain Hayes, Captain Cody, Lieutenant Wilson, Lieutenant Duclos, Lieutenant Cunningham and Lieutenant Hollifield Civil Action No. ) ) ) ) ) 4:20-cv-2903-JMC Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) .  other: This case is dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.  decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge, who adopted the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Thomas E. Rogers, III, United States Magistrate Judge. Date: August 1, 2022 ), ROBIN L. BLUME CLERK OF COURT s/Debbie Stokes Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?