Wilson v. Lee Correction Warden
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the file. Signed by Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell on 04/27/2021. (dsto, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
James Abdula Wilson, #339674,
) C/A No. 4:21-782-RBH-TER
Warden, Lee Correctional Institution,
This is a § 2254 action. This case is before the Court due to Petitioner’s failure to comply
with the magistrate judge’s order. (ECF No. 5). The order was not returned as undeliverable.
The mail in which the Order was sent to Petitioner’s provided address has not been returned
to the court, thus it is presumed that Petitioner received the Order, but has neglected to comply with
the Order within the time permitted under the Order. The Court has not received a response from
Petitioner and the time for compliance has passed. A review of the record indicates that the
magistrate judge specifically informed Petitioner that if Petitioner failed to comply with the Order,
this case would be subject to dismissal.
Petitioner’s lack of response to the Order indicates an intent to not prosecute this case, and
subjects this case to dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)(district courts may dismiss an action if a
Petitioner fails to comply with an order of the court); see also Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95
(4th Cir. 1989)(dismissal with prejudice appropriate where warning given); Chandler Leasing Corp.
v. Lopez, 669 F.2d 919, 920 (4th Cir. 1982)(court may dismiss sua sponte).
Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Florence, South Carolina
April 27, 2021
s/ R. Bryan Harwell
R. Bryan Harwell
Chief United States District Judge
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this order pursuant to Rules 3 and 4
of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?