Hill v. State

Filing 22

JUDGMENT by the Clerk. This case is dismissed with prejudice and without requiring the Respondent to file a return becausethe petition is untimely under the one-year limitations provision of the AEDPA, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). A certificate of appealability is denied. (dsto, )

AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Bruce A. Hill, aka Bruce Antwain Hill
Petitioner

v.
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Respondent

)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No.

4:24-cv-2887-JD

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the petitioner (name)

recover from the respondent (name)

which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of

the amount of

%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of

dollars ($

),

%, along with

costs.
’ the petitioner recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name)
recover costs from the petitioner (name)

.

 other: This case is dismissed with prejudice and without requiring the Respondent to file a return because

the petition is untimely under the one-year limitations provision of the AEDPA, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). A
certificate of appealability is denied..
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable

presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.

 decided by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III, United States District Judge who adopted the Report and

Recommendation of the Honorable Thomas E. Rogers, III, United States Magistrate Judge.
Date: October 23, 2024

ROBIN L. BLUME
CLERK OF COURT
s/Debbie Stokes
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk