Kay v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Filing
27
ORDER granting 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. The court grants Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney's fees in the amount of $3333.83 and directs the Commissioner to pay such fees to Plaintiff forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 10/28/2014.(gnan )
UNIT
TED STATE DISTRIC COURT
ES
CT
DIST
TRICT OF SOUTH CAR
S
ROLINA
April Mari Kay,
ia
Plaintiff,
P
vs.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Ac
W
cting Comm
missioner
of Social Security Adm
S
ministration,
Defendant.
D
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C/A No. 5
5:13-909-KD
DW
O
ORDER
s
mes
he
application for an awar of attorne
rd
ey’s fees
This matter com before th court on Plaintiff’s a
under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA” 28 U.S.C § 2412. EC No. 24. Plaintiff documents
A
”),
C.
CF
15.6 hours of work by her counsel on this matt for whic she seeks a fee award of $2957.2 ECF
o
h
ter,
ch
s
21.
No. 24-1. She also seek reimburse
S
ks
ement of $3
376.62 in acc
crued costs and expenses, making the total
award amou sought $3333.83. Id. The Com
unt
I
mmissioner d
does not ob
bject to Plai
intiff’s Motion. See
Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Pet for Attorne Fees, ECF No. 25.
t.
ey
F
The court has co
onsidered Plaintiff’s Peti
ition and fin Plaintiff satisfies the criteria for such an
nds
f
e
award and finds the tim and rates sought to be reasonable and in acco with app
f
me
e
e
ord
plicable law. Having
.
considered Plaintiff’s Pe
P
etition, and in light of th Commissi
i
he
ioner’s respo
onse, the cou grants Pl
urt
laintiff’s
request for EAJA attorn
E
ney’s fees in the amount of $3333.83 and directs the Comm
n
t
3
missioner to p such
pay
fees to Plain
ntiff forthwit Pursuant to Stephens v. Astrue, 5 F.3d 131, 137 (4th Cir. 2009), p
th.
t
s
565
payment
should be made directly to Plaintiff as the preva
m
y
ailing party r
rather than to her attorne
o
ey.
IT IS SO ORDE
S
ERED.
October 28, 2014
Florence, So
outh Carolin
na
Kaymani D West
D.
United Stat Magistrat Judge
tes
te
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?