Lee v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Filing
24
ORDER: If Plaintiff wishes to pursue her appeal, she is ordered to file a brief in support of her appeal no later than November 9, 2014.Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to comply with this deadline, the undersigned may recommend that this matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 10/27/2014. (gnan )
UN
NITED STATES DISTR
RICT COUR
RT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH C
D
O
CAROLINA
A
Kimberly Lee,
o/b/o K.J.L.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
n
mmissioner
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Com
of Socia Security Administratio
al
A
on,
Defendan
nt.
Action No. 5:14-cv-1356
6-JMC-KDW
W
) Civil A
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
On April 14, 2014, Plaintiff, appear
O
,
ring pro se, filed this a
,
action appea
aling a deni of
ial
social se
ecurity benef
fits. Defend
dant filed an answer an copy of t administ
n
nd
the
trative recor on
rd
August 5, 2014. ECF Nos. 21, 22. Plaintiff’s brief in su
5
F
2
upport of her appeal was due by Oc
r
s
ctober
23, 2014 See Local Rule 83.VII
4.
I.04 (D.S.C. see also E
.);
ECF No. 21. To date, h
however, Pla
aintiff
has not filed her brief, nor has sh contacted the court reg
fi
he
garding the d
deadline.
Accordingly, it appears to the court that Plaint may wis to abando this actio If
A
t
tiff
sh
on
on.
Plaintiff wishes to pursue her ap
p
ppeal, she is ordered to file a brief in support of her appe no
s
o
f
eal
later than November 9, 2014. Plaintiff is ad
n
r
P
dvised that i she fails t comply w this dead
if
to
with
dline,
the unde
ersigned may recommen that this matter be dismissed w
y
nd
with prejudi for failu to
ice
ure
prosecute See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th C 1978); Fe R. Civ. P 41(b).
e.
Cir.
ed.
P.
IT IS SO ORD
T
DERED.
2
October 27, 2014
Florence, South Caro
olina
Kayman D. West
ni
United S
States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?