Lee v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 24

ORDER: If Plaintiff wishes to pursue her appeal, she is ordered to file a brief in support of her appeal no later than November 9, 2014.Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to comply with this deadline, the undersigned may recommend that this matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 10/27/2014. (gnan )

Download PDF
UN NITED STATES DISTR RICT COUR RT DISTRICT OF SOUTH C D O CAROLINA A Kimberly Lee, o/b/o K.J.L., Plaintiff, vs. n mmissioner Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Com of Socia Security Administratio al A on, Defendan nt. Action No. 5:14-cv-1356 6-JMC-KDW W ) Civil A ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) On April 14, 2014, Plaintiff, appear O , ring pro se, filed this a , action appea aling a deni of ial social se ecurity benef fits. Defend dant filed an answer an copy of t administ n nd the trative recor on rd August 5, 2014. ECF Nos. 21, 22. Plaintiff’s brief in su 5 F 2 upport of her appeal was due by Oc r s ctober 23, 2014 See Local Rule 83.VII 4. I.04 (D.S.C. see also E .); ECF No. 21. To date, h however, Pla aintiff has not filed her brief, nor has sh contacted the court reg fi he garding the d deadline. Accordingly, it appears to the court that Plaint may wis to abando this actio If A t tiff sh on on. Plaintiff wishes to pursue her ap p ppeal, she is ordered to file a brief in support of her appe no s o f eal later than November 9, 2014. Plaintiff is ad n r P dvised that i she fails t comply w this dead if to with dline, the unde ersigned may recommen that this matter be dismissed w y nd with prejudi for failu to ice ure prosecute See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th C 1978); Fe R. Civ. P 41(b). e. Cir. ed. P. IT IS SO ORD T DERED. 2 October 27, 2014 Florence, South Caro olina Kayman D. West ni United S States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?