Bryan v. South Carolina, State of

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 10/22/2014. (mcot, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ORANGEBURG DIVISION
Terence Terell Bryan, # 254638,
Petitioner,
v.
Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution,
Respondent.

) C/A No. 5:14-3600-TMC-KDW
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)

This case is before the Court because of Petitioner’s failure to comply with the magistrate
judge’s Order of September 17, 2014. (ECF No. 9).
A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge ordered Petitioner to submit
items needed to render this case into proper form within twenty-one days, and specifically
informed Petitioner that if he failed to do so, this case would be dismissed without prejudice. The
Court has not received any response from Petitioner and the time for his compliance has passed.
The mail in which the Order was sent to Petitioner at the address he provided when the case
was filed has not been returned to the court; thus it is presumed that Petitioner received the Order,
but has neglected to comply with it within the time permitted under the Order.
Petitioner’s lack of response to the Order indicates Petitioner’s intent not to continue
prosecuting this case, and subjects this case to dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (district courts
may dismiss an action if a Petitioner fails to comply with “any order of the court.”); see also
Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989) (dismissal with prejudice appropriate where
warning given); Chandler Leasing Corp. v. Lopez, 669 F.2d 919, 920 (4th Cir. 1982) (court may

dismiss sua sponte).
Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close
the file.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Timothy M. Cain
United States District Judge

Anderson, South Carolina
October 22, 2014

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within the time period set
forth under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

1

Under General Order, Misc. No. 3:07-5014-JFA, this dismissal without prejudice does not count
as a “strike” for purposes of the “three strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). If Petitioner
wishes to bring this action in the future, he should obtain new forms for doing so from the Clerk’s
Office in Columbia (901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201).
2