Bryan v. McFadden
Filing
20
ORDER denying 19 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 12/9/2014.(mcot, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISCTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ORANGEBURG DIVISION
T. Terell Bryan,
Petitioner,
v.
Warden McFadden,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 5:14-3627
OPINION & ORDER
Before the court is Petitioner’s motion to alter or amend the court’s October 31, 2014
order. (ECF No. 19). Petitioner asserts that the judgment is void under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure (“FRCP”) 60(b)(4). FRCP 60(b)(4) states: “On motion and just terms, the court may
relieve a party . . . from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: . . . (4)
the judgment is void.” “[A] void judgment is one so affected by a fundamental infirmity that the
infirmity may be raised even after the judgment becomes final.” U.S. Aid Funds, Inc. v.
Espinosa, 559 U.S. 260, 271 (2010). “The list of such infirmities is exceedingly short.” Id.
“Rule 60(b)(4) applies only in the rare instance where a judgment is premised either on a certain
type of jurisdictional error or on a violation of due process that deprives a party of notice or the
opportunity to be heard.” Id.
Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration does not list any portion of the court’s order that
is “so affected by a fundamental infirmity.” Instead, Petitioner asserts that this court’s order is
void because the South Carolina Supreme Court retained jurisdiction until it decided his case on
October 7, 2014. (ECF No. 19). Even if the legal standard asserted by Petitioner was correct,
the court decided his case on October 31, 2014, after the South Carolina Supreme Court denied
his petition for rehearing. Therefore, Petitioner’s motion is without merit, and accordingly, the
court DENIES the motion to alter/amend the court’s order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Timothy M. Cain
United States District Judge
December 9, 2014
Anderson, South Carolina
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this order pursuant to Rules 3 and 4
of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?