Middleton v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Filing
27
ORDER: It appears to the court that Plaintiff may wish to abandon this action. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue his appeal, he is ordered to file a brief in support of his appeal no later than June 10, 2015. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to comply with this deadline, the undersigned may recommend that this matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 5/27/2015. (gnan ) Modified on 5/27/2015 to edit text. (gnan ).
UN
NITED STATES DISTR
RICT COUR
RT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH C
D
O
CAROLINA
A
David Scott Middle
S
eton,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Com
n
mmissioner
of Socia Security Administratio
al
A
on,
Defendan
nt.
Action No. 5:14-cv-4181
1-TMC-KDW
W
) Civil A
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
On October 27, 2014, Pl
O
2
laintiff, appe
earing pro se filed this action appe
e,
ealing a deni of
ial
social se
ecurity benef
fits. Defend
dant filed an answer an copy of t administ
n
nd
the
trative recor on
rd
April 14, 2015. ECF Nos. 22, 23 Plaintiff’s brief in sup
,
F
3.
s
upport of his appeal was due by Ma 18,
s
s
ay
2015. See Local Rul 83.VII.04 (D.S.C.); se also ECF No. 22. To date, howe
le
ee
F
o
ever, Plaintif has
ff
not filed his brief, no has he con
or
ntacted the co regardin the deadl
ourt
ng
line.
Accordingly, it appears to the court that Plaint may wis to abando this actio If
A
t
tiff
sh
on
on.
Plaintiff wishes to pu
ursue his app
peal, he is or
rdered to file a brief in s
e
support of h appeal no later
his
o
than Jun 10, 2015 Plaintiff is advised that if he f
ne
5.
t
fails to com
mply with th deadline the
his
e,
undersign
ned may re
ecommend that this matter be di
m
ismissed wi prejudic for failu to
ith
ce
ure
prosecute See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th C 1978); Fe R. Civ. P 41(b).
e.
Cir.
ed.
P.
IT IS SO ORD
T
DERED.
May 27, 2015
Florence, South Caro
olina
Kayman D. West
ni
United S
States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?