Middleton v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 27

ORDER: It appears to the court that Plaintiff may wish to abandon this action. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue his appeal, he is ordered to file a brief in support of his appeal no later than June 10, 2015. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to comply with this deadline, the undersigned may recommend that this matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 5/27/2015. (gnan ) Modified on 5/27/2015 to edit text. (gnan ).

Download PDF
UN NITED STATES DISTR RICT COUR RT DISTRICT OF SOUTH C D O CAROLINA A David Scott Middle S eton, Plaintiff, vs. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Com n mmissioner of Socia Security Administratio al A on, Defendan nt. Action No. 5:14-cv-4181 1-TMC-KDW W ) Civil A ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) On October 27, 2014, Pl O 2 laintiff, appe earing pro se filed this action appe e, ealing a deni of ial social se ecurity benef fits. Defend dant filed an answer an copy of t administ n nd the trative recor on rd April 14, 2015. ECF Nos. 22, 23 Plaintiff’s brief in sup , F 3. s upport of his appeal was due by Ma 18, s s ay 2015. See Local Rul 83.VII.04 (D.S.C.); se also ECF No. 22. To date, howe le ee F o ever, Plaintif has ff not filed his brief, no has he con or ntacted the co regardin the deadl ourt ng line. Accordingly, it appears to the court that Plaint may wis to abando this actio If A t tiff sh on on. Plaintiff wishes to pu ursue his app peal, he is or rdered to file a brief in s e support of h appeal no later his o than Jun 10, 2015 Plaintiff is advised that if he f ne 5. t fails to com mply with th deadline the his e, undersign ned may re ecommend that this matter be di m ismissed wi prejudic for failu to ith ce ure prosecute See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th C 1978); Fe R. Civ. P 41(b). e. Cir. ed. P. IT IS SO ORD T DERED. May 27, 2015 Florence, South Caro olina Kayman D. West ni United S States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?