Guilfoyle v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint - Social Security, filed by Sonia Guilfoyle:It is recommended that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded for further administrative action. Objections to R&R due by 2/1/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 1/13/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to File Objections).(gnan )
Notice of Right to File Objections to Report and Recommendation
The parties are advised that they may file specific written objections to this Report and
Recommendation with the District Judge. Objections must specifically identify the portions of
the Report and Recommendation to which objections are made and the basis for such objections.
“[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review,
but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order
to accept the recommendation.’” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310 (4th
Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note).
Specific written objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of service
of this Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see Fed. R.
Civ. P. 6(a), (d). Filing by mail pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 may be
accomplished by mailing objections to:
Robin L. Blume Clerk
United States District Court
Post Office Box 2317
Florence, South Carolina 29503
Failure to timely file specific written objections to this Report and Recommendation
will result in waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of the District Court based
upon such Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985);
Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?