United States of America v. Brooker
Filing
33
CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of the United States against Merilyn M. Brooker and the Estate of David W. Brooker, deceased. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/29/2015. (asni, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ORANGEBURG DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MERILYN M. BROOKER, individually
)
and as the personal representative of the
)
ESTATE OF DAVID W. BROOKER,
)
deceased,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________________ )
Civil Action No. 5:14-cv-04490-JMC
JUDGMENT
Having granted the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Judgment by Consent against
Defendant Merilyn M. Brooker (ECF No. 30) by separate order (ECF No. 31), the court now
ENTERS final judgment in this case as follows:
a. in favor of the United States and against Merilyn M. Brooker and the Estate of David
W. Brooker, deceased, jointly in the amount of $294,933.48 as of June 26, 2015, plus interest
and other statutory additions accruing after that date for unpaid federal income tax liabilities
assessed against them jointly for the tax years 1998 to 2004, 2006, and 2007; and
b. in favor of the United States and against the Estate of David W. Brooker, deceased, in
the amount of $34,058.21 as of June 26, 2015, plus interest and other statutory additions
accruing after that date for unpaid federal income tax liabilities assessed against him for the tax
years 2010 and 2011; and
c. in favor of the United States and against Merilyn M. Brooker in the amount of
$3,187.51 as of June 26, 2015, plus interest and other statutory additions accruing after that date
for unpaid federal income tax liabilities assessed against her for the tax years 2010 and 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
July 29, 2015
Columbia, South Carolina
2
12843393.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?