Young v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Filing
34
ORDER granting 31 Motion for Attorney Fees: The court orders the defendant to pay the sum of $3,400.00 in attorney's fees and $16.00 in expenses pursuant to EAJA. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 6/30/2017.(gnan )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ORANGEBURG DIVISION
Allison B. Young,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner )
of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
C/A No.: 5:15-cv-04153-RBH
ORDER
On June 16, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to
Justice Act (“EAJA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2412, on the basis that the position taken by the defendant in this
action was not substantially justified. In the motion, Plaintiff requested attorney’s fees in the amount
of $4,752.56 and expenses in the amount of $16.00. On June 28, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation
indicating that the parties agreed to an EAJA award of $3,400.00 in attorney’s fees and $16.00 in
expenses. The stipulation provides that fees awarded are subject to be offset if the prevailing party
owes a debt to the federal government.
Based on the foregoing and after considering the briefs and materials submitted by the parties,
the court orders the defendant to pay the sum of $3,400.00 in attorney’s fees and $16.00 in expenses
pursuant to EAJA, subject to the Treasury Offset Program if the prevailing party owes a debt to the
federal government. However, the payment shall be made payable to the claimant pursuant to Astrue
v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and mailed to her attorney, with a copy to the claimant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 30, 2017
Florence, South Carolina
s/ R. Bryan Harwell
R. Bryan Harwell
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?