Smoak v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 12

ORDER: It appears to the court that Plaintiff may wish to abandon this action. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue her appeal, she is ordered to file a brief in support of his appeal no later than November 29, 2017. Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to comply with this deadline, the undersigned may recommend that this matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 11/15/2017. (gnan, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Kathy Lynn Smoak, Plaintiff, vs. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-01170-JMC-KDW ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) On May 4, 2017, Plaintiff, appearing through counsel, filed this action appealing her denial of social security benefits. Defendant filed an Answer and copy of the administrative record on September 5, 2017. ECF Nos. 5, 6. Plaintiff’s brief in support of her appeal was due by October 5, 2017. See Local Civ. Rule 83.VII.04 (D.S.C.); see also ECF No. 5. On October 4, 2017, Plaintiff sought and received an extension, making her brief due November 6, 2017. ECF Nos. 8, 9. To date, however, Plaintiff has not filed her brief, nor has counsel communicated with the court regarding the extended deadline. Accordingly, it appears to the court that Plaintiff may wish to abandon this action. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue her appeal, she is ordered to file a brief in support of his appeal no later than November 29, 2017. Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to comply with this deadline, the undersigned may recommend that this matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir. 1978); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. November 15, 2017 Florence, South Carolina Kaymani D. West United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?