Scott v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Filing
15
ORDER: It appears to the court that Plaintiff may wish to abandon this action. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue her appeal, she is ordered to file a brief in support of his appeal no later than December 15, 2017. Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to comply with this deadline, the undersigned may recommend that this matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 12/1/2017. (gnan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Lizzie Lee Scott,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
) Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-01341-DCN-KDW
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
On May 23, 2017, Plaintiff, appearing through counsel, filed this action appealing a denial
of social security benefits. ECF No. 1. Defendant filed an Answer and copy of the administrative
record on September 26, 2017. ECF Nos. 9, 10. Plaintiff’s brief in support of her appeal was due
by October 26, 2017. See Local Rule 83.VII.04 (D.S.C.); see also ECF No. 9. On October 24,
2017, Plaintiff sought and received an extension, making her brief due November 27, 2017. ECF
Nos. 12, 13. To date, however, Plaintiff has not filed her brief, nor has counsel communicated with
the court regarding the extended deadline.
Accordingly, it appears to the court that Plaintiff may wish to abandon this action. If
Plaintiff wishes to pursue her appeal, she is ordered to file a brief in support of his appeal no later
than December 15, 2017. Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to comply with this deadline, the
undersigned may recommend that this matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir. 1978); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 1, 2017
Florence, South Carolina
Kaymani D. West
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?