Manning & Sons Trucking & Utilities LLC et al v. McCarthy Improvement Company
Filing
49
ORDER AND OPINION granting 43 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting 45 Motion to Consolidate Cases Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 6/6/2018.(asni, ) (Main Document 49 replaced on 6/6/2018) (asni, ). Modified to replace document at the request of chambers to correct scrivener's error on 6/6/2018 (asni, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ORANGEBURG DIVISION
Manning & Sons Trucking & Utilities, LLC )
and Keven Manning, Individually,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
) Civil Action No.: 5:17-cv-01994-JMC
)
v.
)
)
ORDER AND OPINION
McCarthy Improvement Company,
)
)
Defendant.
)
________________________
)
)
McCarthy Improvement Company,
)
)
Counter-Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Manning & Sons Trucking & Utilities, LLC )
and SouthStar Capital, LLC
)
)
Counter-Defendants. )
)
This matter is before the court pursuant to Defendant’s Motion to Consolidate (ECF No.
43) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate and Motion for a Status Conference (ECF No. 45). 1 The
parties move the court to consolidate this case with a separate case in which they are also parties,
McCarthy Improvement Co. v. Manning & Sons Trucking & Utilities, LLC, et al., Civil Action No.
2:17-cv-03290-JMC. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to
Consolidate (ECF No. 43) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 45). 2
1
Plaintiffs and McCarthy Improvement Company (“McCarthy”) filed respective Motions to
Consolidate in McCarthy Improvement Co., Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-03290, ECF Nos. 47, 48.
2
The court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Status Conference (ECF No. 45) and has scheduled
a status conference for June 7, 2018.
1
The court may consolidate multiple pending actions involving “common question[s] of law
or fact” into one action in the interest of efficiency. Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2). “District courts enjoy
substantial discretion in deciding whether and to what extent to consolidate cases.” Hall v. Hall,
138 S. Ct. 1118, 1131 (2018).
There are common questions of fact in both cases as both cases arise from the parties’
participation in a construction project in Orangeburg County, South Carolina. (ECF Nos. 43 at 2;
45 at 2.) There are also common questions of law in both cases. Plaintiffs bring several causes of
action against Defendant including, fraud; Defendant’s violation of the S.C. Unfair Trade Practices
Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 39-5-10 et seq. (1971); negligence and negligent misrepresentation;
defamation and slander; Defendant’s violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; and
abuse of process and malicious prosecution. (See ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant counterclaimed for
breach of contract and/or mistake against Plaintiffs or in the alternative for unjust enrichment
against just Manning & Sons Trucking & Utilities, LLC. (ECF No. 24 at 1-3.) Defendant also
counterclaimed against SouthStar Capital, LLC (“SouthStar”) for unjust enrichment and/or
mistake. (Id. at 3-5.)
In the other case, Defendant filed a declaratory judgment action against Plaintiffs and
SouthStar, seeking the following declarations: the parties’ obligations under the subcontract,
whether Plaintiffs and SouthStar have any common law, statutory, or regulatory claim against
Defendant, that Defendant does not owe Plaintiffs or SouthStar any further sums of money, and
that Plaintiffs and SouthStar were unjustly enriched and therefore, must refund McCarthy. First
Amended Petition for Declaratory Judgment, McCarthy Improvement Co., Civil Action No. 2:17cv-03290, ECF No. 1-1 at 174-81.
2
Upon review of the facts and law in each case, the court finds that there are common
questions of law and fact within each case and that judicial efficiency is best served by
consolidating the two cases. Accordingly, the court GRANTS the parties respective Motions to
Consolidate. (ECF Nos. 43, 45.) The cases are consolidated for both pretrial purposes and for
trial purposes unless otherwise ordered by the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
June 6, 2018
Columbia, South Carolina
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?