Stalnaker v. Warden Martell of MacDougall
Filing
45
ORDER TO VACATE: The Court hereby vacates its order adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report without objection (ECF No. 41 ), and the Court grants Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file objections (ECF No. 44 ). The Court instructs Petitioner to file his objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report on or before April 8, 2024. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 03/20/2024. (dsto, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Chad Stalnaker, also known as,
Chad Patrick Stalnaker,
)
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
Warden Martell of MacDougall,
)
)
Respondent.
)
________________________________ )
Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-1335-BHH
ORDER
On March 18, 2024, this Court entered an order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation without objection and granting Respondent’s motion for
summary judgment as to Petitioner Chad Stalnaker’s (“ Petitioner” or “Stalnaker”) petition
for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 41.) However, later
the same day, the Court also received a motion for extension of time to file objections from
Petitioner, which was signed on March 12, 2024, and was postmarked March 13, 2024.
(ECF Nos. 44 at 2, 44-2 at 1.) In his motion, Petitioner asserts that he did not receive the
Magistrate Judge’s Report until March 12, 2024, and he asks for an extension of time to
file his objections to the Report.
After review, therefore, the Court hereby vacates its order adopting the Magistrate
Judge’s Report without objection (ECF No. 41), and the Court grants Petitioner’s motion
for an extension of time to file objections (ECF No. 44). The Court instructs Petitioner
to file his objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report on or before April 8, 2024.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/Bruce H. Hendricks
United States District Judge
March 20, 2024
Charleston, South Carolina
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?