Pitt v. Warden U.S.P. Beaumont et al

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 03/27/2024. (dsto, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Zeph Pitt, Plaintiff, v. Warden, U.S.P. Beaumont; Does 1-10; and Officers at U.S.P. Beaumont, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No.: 5:23-6979-BHH ORDER Zeph Pitt (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action alleging a violation of his civil rights. On January 3, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete, sign, and return a standard complaint form, to pay the $350 filing fee or complete and return an application to proceed without prepayment of fees, and to provide service documents for his case. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff was warned that a failure to provide the necessary information within a specific time period may subject the case to dismissal. (Id.) The time for Plaintiff to file a response expired on January 24, 2024, and Plaintiff did not file a response. As Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order of this Court, the Court hereby dismisses this case without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Bruce H. Hendricks United States District Judge March 27, 2024 Charleston, South Carolina 1 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within the time period set forth under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?