BidZirk LLC et al v. Smith

Filing 133

Deficiency Memo 132 Response to Motion. See attached Deficiency Memo. Any response due is based on the filing date of the original document. Docket Correction due 10/17/2007. (awil)

BidZirk LLC et al v. Smith

Doc. 133

6:06-cv-00109-HMH

Date Filed 10/16/2007

Entry Number 133

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION DEFICIENCY MEMORANDUM

TO: FROM: RE: DATE:

KEVIN ELWELL AMANDA WILLIAMS, 864-241-2713 6:06-109-HMH October 16, 2007

Pursuant to Rule 5, Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the RESPONSE (DOCUMENT 132) has been filed. However, it is deficient in the area(s) checked below:

I.

When the deficiency noted is corrected and the document refiled, the Clerk will change the filing document date and response due date back to that of the original filing. The original filing will then be deleted. The corrected document must not contain any changes other than to correct the deficiency noted. Response is due based on the original filing date, regardless of the deficiency noted.

O

Attached to the Response were two deposition transcripts. Pursuant to Local Rule

5.01 regarding discovery "If relief is sought with respect to any discovery material or deposition, a copy of the relevant portion of the discovery material or deposition shall be filed with the Court." Please refile the relevant portions of the depositions as "Additional Attachments to Main Document."

Please correct the deficiency(ies) as noted above within one business day.

Dockets.Justia.com