BidZirk LLC et al v. Smith

Filing 14

Deficiency Memo #13 Motion filed 2/27/06 Wrong event used. Any response due is based on the filing date of the original document. Docket Correction due 3/1/2006. (awil)

BidZirk LLC et al v. Smith

Doc. 14

6:06-cv-00109-HMH

Date Filed 02/28/2006

Entry Number 14

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION DEFICIENCY MEMORANDUM

TO: FROM: RE: DATE:

KEVIN ELWELL AMANDA WILLIAMS, 864-241-2700 6:06-109-HMH February 28, 2006

Pursuant to Rule 5, Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the MOTION REQUESTING PROTECTION has been filed. However, it is deficient in the area(s) checked below:

I.

When the deficiency noted is corrected and the document refiled, the Clerk will change the filing document date and response due date back to that of the original filing. The original filing will then be deleted. The corrected document must not contain any changes other than to correct the deficiency noted. Response is due based on the original filing date, regardless of the deficiency noted.

G G G G G G O

Pleading not signed with s/Name on signature line or digital signature Incorrect case number listed on document filed Document filed in wrong case Document not legible Document signed by attorney but e-filed under another attorney's login Documents filed together, please separate and refile Wrong Event used - Per Judge Herlong's filing preferences "A request for

protection should be filed as a notice. Please include in docket entry the dates for which protection is requested." Please correct the deficiency(ies) as noted above within one business day.

Dockets.Justia.com