BidZirk LLC et al v. Smith
Filing
91
Deficiency Memo regarding entry 90 Motion Submission of Proposed Scheduling Order: See attached Deficiency Memo. Any response due is based on the filing date of the original document. Docket Correction due 5/9/2007. (jtho, )
<![CDATA[
BidZirk LLC et al v. Smith
Doc. 91
6:06-cv-00109-HMH
Date Filed 05/08/2007
Entry Number 91
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION DEFICIENCY MEMORANDUM
TO: FROM: RE: DATE:
Kevin Elwell Jackie Thomas 864-241-2751 BidZirk v Smith May 8, 2007
Pursuant to Rule 5, Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the Motion Submission of Proposed Scheduling Order (entry 90) has been filed. However, it is deficient in the area(s) checked below:
I.
When the deficiency noted is corrected and the document refiled, the Clerk will change the filing document date and response due date back to that of the original filing. The original filing will then be deleted. The corrected document must not contain any changes other than to correct the deficiency noted. Response is due based on the original filing date, regardless of the deficiency noted.
O
Wrong Event used. Please file as Motion to Amend and link to last filed scheduling order. Do not attach Proposed Amended Scheduling Order. Email proposed order to catoe_ecf@scd.uscourts.gov Please file corrected entry by May 9,2 007. Please call 864-241-2751 if you have any questions.
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
