White v. Stulz Golf Technologies LLC et al

Filing 4

ORDER. Stulz Golf Technologies, LLC is hereby ordered to inform the court of the citizenship of all of its members for the purpose of determining whether the requirements of federal subject matter jurisdiction are satisfied. The parties are ordered to inform the court within ten (10) days of this order whether the matter in controversy satisfies the requirements of 1332. Signed by Judge Henry M Herlong Jr on 5/3/06. (pbog) Modified on 5/4/2006 to edit text (awil).

Download PDF
White v. Stulz Golf Technologies LLC et al Doc. 4 6:06-cv-01303-HMH Date Filed 05/03/2006 Entry Number 4 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Joseph J. White, Plaintiff, vs. Stulz Golf Technologies, LLC, and Andreas Stulz, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 6:06-1303-HMH OPINION AND ORDER Stulz Golf Technologies, LLC is hereby ordered to inform the court of the citizenship of all of its members for the purpose of determining whether the requirements of federal subject matter jurisdiction are satisfied. See 28 U.S.C. 1332; Gen. Tech. Applications, Inc. v. Exro Ltda, 388 F.3d 114, 120 (4th Cir. 2004). Stulz Golf Technologies, LLC is ordered to respond within ten (10) days of the date of this order. In addition, the notice of removal does not indicate that the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000. As such, the parties are ordered to inform the court within ten (10) days of this order whether the matter in controversy satisfies the requirements of 1332. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Henry M. Herlong, Jr. United States District Judge Greenville, South Carolina May 3, 2006 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?